RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$48.53B
5Y Perf.+374.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RL vs TPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
Luxury Goods
Market Cap$27.32B
5Y Perf.+881.5%
RL vs TPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RL | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $48.53B | $27.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.83B | $7.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $919M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 69.6% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.67B | $3.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.92B | $1.10B |
RL vs TPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RL
TPR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 474.7 | +374.7% |
| Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) | 100 | 981.5 | +881.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RL vs TPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Tapestry, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Income Pick
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs TPR's 256.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
TPR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.59, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.87x
- Lower P/E (20.3x vs 22.0x)
- +74.1% vs RL's +44.0%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RL | 6.7% revenue growth vs TPR's 5.1% |
| Value | TPR | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 22.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | RL | 11.7% margin vs TPR's 8.4% |
| Stability / Safety | RL | Beta 1.53 vs TPR's 1.59, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RL | 0.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TPR's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TPR | +74.1% vs RL's +44.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RL | 11.8% ROA vs TPR's 10.2%, ROIC 20.6% vs 6.8% |
RL vs TPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2020
FY 2025
RL vs TPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRLLAGGINGTPR
TPRTapestry, Inc.
2leads
RLRalph Lauren Corporat…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TPRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TPR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RL8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TPR5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
RL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPR and RL operate at a comparable scale, with $7.9B and $7.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.7% (RL) to 8.4% (TPR). On growth, TPR holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $7.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $919M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $695M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.6% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +73.7% |
TPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RL and TPR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, RL trades at a 81% valuation discount to TPR's 162.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RL's 42.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPR's 47.1x.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48.5B | $27.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.3B | $30.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.87x | 162.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.98x | 20.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 42.79x | 47.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.86x | 3.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.86x | 34.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.63x | 24.97x |
Evenly matched — RL and TPR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPR delivers a 106.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $106 in annual profit, vs $32 for RL. RL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPR's 4.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs TPR's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.8% | +106.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.6% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 4.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $746M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.25x | 15.58x |
RL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPR five years ago would be worth $29,706 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,197 for RL. Over the past 12 months, TPR leads with a +74.1% total return vs RL's +44.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPR at 53.0% vs RL's 48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.0% | +74.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.7% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.0% | +197.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.6% | +256.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.8% | +53.0% |
TPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RL is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPR's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RL currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs TPR's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $393.41 | $161.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $246.08 | $75.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 35.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 534K | 1.8M |
RL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RL and TPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RL as "Buy" and TPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.7% upside for TPR (target: $168) vs 19.7% for RL (target: $429). For income investors, TPR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.01% vs RL's 0.88%.
| Metric | RLRalph Lauren Corp… | TPRTapestry, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $429.13 | $167.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.14 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +7.4% |
Evenly matched — RL and TPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Best OverallRalph Lauren Corporation (RL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RL vs TPR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RL or TPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger pick with 6.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RL or TPR?
On trailing P/E, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Tapestry, Inc. at 162. 8x. On forward P/E, Tapestry, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RL or TPR?
Over the past 5 years, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) delivered a total return of +197. 1%, compared to +172. 0% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +324. 6% versus TPR's +256. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RL or TPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
53β versus Tapestry, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning TPR is approximately 4% more volatile than RL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 5% for Tapestry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RL or TPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is pulling ahead at 6.
7% versus 5. 1% for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ralph Lauren Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -76. 6% for Tapestry, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RL leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RL or TPR?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 2. 6% for Tapestry, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 9% for TPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPR leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RL or TPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Ralph Lauren Corporation — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPR: 25. 7% to $167. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — RL or TPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL).
09Is RL or TPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +324. 6% 10Y return). Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +324. 6%, TPR: +256. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RL and TPR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(RL: 12.2% · TPR: 21.2%)Net Margin>
%
(RL: 11.7% · TPR: 8.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(RL: 30.9x · TPR: 162.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.