Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RMBS
Rambus Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.69B
5Y Perf.+714.7%
SSNC
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.92B
5Y Perf.+21.0%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.-34.6%

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RMBS logoRMBS
SSNC logoSSNC
IPGP logoIPGP
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductors
Market Cap$13.69B$16.92B$4.31B
Revenue (TTM)$721M$6.41B$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$230M$810M$29M
Gross Margin77.0%48.0%37.6%
Operating Margin35.9%23.1%0.3%
Forward P/E42.9x10.1x62.6x
Total Debt$44M$7.65B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$183M$3.57B$404M

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RMBS
SSNC
IPGP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Rambus Inc. (RMBS)100814.7+714.7%
SS&C Technologies H… (SSNC)100121.0+21.0%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)10065.4-34.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RMBS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
The Growth Play

RMBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 27.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
  • 10.1% 10Y total return vs SSNC's 164.9%
  • 27.1% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SSNC
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

SSNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 1.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 1.07x
  • Beta 0.79, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.07x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Secondary Option

IPGP plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRMBS logoRMBS27.1% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7%
ValueSSNC logoSSNCLower P/E (10.1x vs 62.6x)
Quality / MarginsRMBS logoRMBS31.9% margin vs IPGP's 2.8%
Stability / SafetySSNC logoSSNCBeta 0.79 vs RMBS's 3.00
DividendsSSNC logoSSNC1.4% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RMBS logoRMBS+148.9% vs SSNC's -7.3%
Efficiency (ROA)RMBS logoRMBS15.5% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs 0.6%

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RMBSRambus Inc.
FY 2025
Product Revenue
49.1%$348M
Royalty
39.5%$279M
Contract and other Revenue
11.4%$80M
SSNCSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Software Enabled Services
83.1%$5.2B
Maintenance And Term Licenses
14.5%$913M
Professional Services
1.7%$104M
Perpetual Licenses
0.7%$45M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRMBSLAGGINGIPGP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RMBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SSNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 8.9x RMBS's $721M. RMBS is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPGP's 2.8%. On growth, IPGP holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$721M$6.4B$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$288M$2.0B$55M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$230M$810M$29M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$335M$1.7B$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.0%+48.0%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.9%+23.1%+0.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.9%+12.6%+2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+46.5%+26.7%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.1%+8.8%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.8%+8.3%-54.4%
RMBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SSNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.2x trailing earnings, SSNC trades at a 84% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSNC's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IPGP's 48.9x.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Market CapShares × price$13.7B$16.9B$4.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.6B$21.0B$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS60.00x22.25x139.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.42.88x10.14x62.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.69x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple46.57x9.81x48.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue19.35x2.70x4.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.18x2.56x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF41.10x10.17x
SSNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RMBS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

RMBS delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. RMBS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSNC's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RMBS scores 6/9 vs SSNC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.4%+11.6%+1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.5%+4.1%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.1%+8.9%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+19.5%+9.5%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x1.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$139M$4.1B-$404M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$183M$3.6B$404M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$44M$7.6B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense217.32x4.80x
RMBS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RMBS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RMBS five years ago would be worth $65,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,151 for IPGP. Over the past 12 months, RMBS leads with a +148.9% total return vs SSNC's -7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RMBS at 37.7% vs IPGP's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.5%-18.0%+35.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+148.9%-7.3%+75.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+161.1%+30.9%-12.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+553.9%+1.7%-48.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1011.5%+164.9%+20.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+37.7%+9.4%-4.4%
RMBS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RMBS and SSNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SSNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RMBS's 3.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMBS currently trades 78.2% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.00x0.79x1.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$161.80$91.07$155.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$49.61$65.06$53.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.2%+77.0%+65.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.348.339.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M2.5M510K
Evenly matched — RMBS and SSNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SSNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: RMBS as "Buy", SSNC as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs 7.2% for RMBS (target: $136). SSNC is the only dividend payer here at 1.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricRMBS logoRMBSRambus Inc.SSNC logoSSNCSS&C Technologies…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$135.67$94.20$151.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts142427
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+6.1%+1.3%
SSNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RMBS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SSNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallRambus Inc. (RMBS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RMBS vs SSNC vs IPGP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RMBS or SSNC or IPGP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rambus Inc.

(RMBS) is the stronger pick with 27. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rambus Inc. (RMBS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

On trailing P/E, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) is the cheapest at 22. 2x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

Over the past 5 years, Rambus Inc.

(RMBS) delivered a total return of +553. 9%, compared to -48. 5% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RMBS returned +1011% versus IPGP's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Rambus Inc. 's 3. 00β — meaning RMBS is approximately 279% more volatile than SSNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rambus Inc. (RMBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 110% for SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rambus Inc.

(RMBS) is pulling ahead at 27. 1% versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to 5. 0% for SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RMBS leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

Rambus Inc.

(RMBS) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 6% net margin versus 3. 1% for IPG Photonics Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMBS leads at 36. 8% versus 1. 3% for IPGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMBS leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RMBS or SSNC or IPGP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 52. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RMBS or SSNC or IPGP?

In this comparison, SSNC (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. RMBS, IPGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RMBS or SSNC or IPGP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 1. 4% yield, +164. 9% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSNC: +164. 9%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RMBS and SSNC and IPGP?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RMBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SSNC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SSNC pays a dividend while RMBS, IPGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RMBS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSNC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RMBS and SSNC and IPGP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RMBS: 8.1% · SSNC: 8.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(RMBS: 31.9% · SSNC: 12.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RMBS: 60.0x · SSNC: 22.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.