Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Renewable Utilities
Solar
Solar
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $7.84B | $10.57B | $1.25B | $3.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $129.66B | $1.43B | $6.43B | $1.21B | $3.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.97B | $169M | $212M | $-67M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 50.3% | 44.8% | 22.4% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 48.4% | 12.0% | 13.3% | 4.5% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.4x | 26.9x | — | 11.7x | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $732.28B | $10.20B | $35.73B | $766M | $14.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40.42B | $818M | $2.31B | $244M | $1.24B |
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 22.8x)
CWEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.9%
- 237.4% 10Y total return vs BEP's 199.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.54, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
BEP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ARRY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2%
- 17.9% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
- +86.7% vs RNW's -17.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BEP's 11.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.7% vs RNW's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -0.5% vs 9.0% |
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARRY leads in 1 of 6 categories
CWEN leads 1 • RNW leads 0 • BEP leads 0 • RUN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RNW and RUN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW is the larger business by revenue, generating $129.7B annually — 107.6x ARRY's $1.2B. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $129.7B | $1.4B | $6.4B | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86.9B | $1.0B | $3.3B | $95M | $541M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.0B | $169M | $212M | -$67M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23.8B | $268M | -$8.3B | $58M | -$326M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.9% | +50.3% | +44.8% | +22.4% | +23.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +12.0% | +13.3% | +4.5% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +11.8% | +3.3% | -5.6% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +18.8% | -128.7% | +4.8% | -10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | +21.1% | +9.1% | -26.1% | +43.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.8% | -35.3% | +25.3% | -7.0% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RNW and BEP and ARRY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 83% valuation discount to RNW's 46.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RNW's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $7.8B | $10.6B | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $17.2B | $44.0B | $1.8B | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.91x | 26.86x | -512.46x | -11.23x | 8.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.40x | — | — | 11.75x | 22.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.59x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 16.23x | 13.18x | 13.50x | 24.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 5.48x | 1.62x | 0.98x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 0.77x | 0.28x | 4.80x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.24x | — | 15.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. BEP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +3.0% | +0.6% | -20.6% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.2% | -4.4% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +9.0% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +8.2% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.59x | 1.72x | 1.02x | 2.94x | 2.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $691.9B | $9.4B | $33.4B | $522M | $13.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40.4B | $818M | $2.3B | $244M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $732.3B | $10.2B | $35.7B | $766M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 86.76x | 0.55x | 1.04x | -2.42x | -0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWEN five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,024 for RUN. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +86.7% total return vs RNW's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWEN at 12.8% vs ARRY's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | +13.7% | +25.1% | -15.3% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.7% | +39.6% | +60.8% | +62.7% | +86.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.4% | +43.5% | +23.4% | -56.1% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.7% | +72.5% | +12.6% | -67.7% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +237.4% | +199.1% | -77.5% | +86.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +12.8% | +7.3% | -24.0% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWEN and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEP currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs RUN's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.54x | 0.85x | 2.32x | 2.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $41.54 | $35.97 | $12.23 | $22.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.38 | $27.67 | $22.27 | $4.92 | $5.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +91.8% | +96.0% | +67.0% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 45.9 | 57.2 | 56.4 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 734K | 828K | 875K | 6.0M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWEN and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNW as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy", BEP as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for RUN (target: $18) vs 1.8% for BEP (target: $35). For income investors, BEP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.70% vs CWEN's 7.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.52 | $43.67 | $35.17 | $9.17 | $18.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 16 | 20 | 28 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.9% | +11.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.01 | $4.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARRY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). CWEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
RNW vs CWEN vs BEP vs ARRY vs RUN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus ReNew Energy Global Plc at 46. 9x. On forward P/E, ReNew Energy Global Plc is actually cheaper at 0. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
Over the past 5 years, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) delivered a total return of +72. 5%, compared to -69. 8% for Sunrun Inc. (RUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWEN returned +237. 4% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 435% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for ReNew Energy Global Plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNW leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53. 5% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNW leads at 91. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) trades at 0.
4x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 31. 4% to $18. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN?
In this comparison, BEP (11.
7% yield), CWEN (7. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RNW, ARRY, RUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RNW or CWEN or BEP or ARRY or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 9% yield, +237. 4% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 4%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RNW and CWEN and BEP and ARRY and RUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RNW (Utilities) and CWEN (Utilities) and BEP (Utilities) and ARRY (Energy) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. CWEN, BEP pay a dividend while RNW, ARRY, RUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.