Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Renewable Utilities
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $925M | $23.63B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $129.66B | $315M | $5.42B | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.97B | $-42M | $1.67B | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 50.4% | 41.7% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 48.4% | -2.7% | 33.0% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.4x | 5.5x | 12.4x | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $732.28B | $188M | $499M | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40.42B | $10M | $2.80B | $818M |
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 90.6 | -9.4% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 32.1 | -67.9% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPWR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 334.7% 10Y total return vs CWEN's 237.5%
- PEG 0.40 vs CWEN's 0.59
- 24.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
CWEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.55, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.55 vs SPWR's 2.15
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 26.9x), PEG 0.40 vs 0.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SPWR's -13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SPWR's 2.15 | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.4% vs SPWR's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3% |
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CWEN leads 2 • RNW leads 1 • SPWR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW is the larger business by revenue, generating $129.7B annually — 412.3x SPWR's $315M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, RNW holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $129.7B | $315M | $5.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86.9B | -$6M | $2.2B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.0B | -$42M | $1.7B | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23.8B | -$15M | $1.7B | $189M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.9% | +50.4% | +41.7% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | -2.7% | +33.0% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -13.2% | +30.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -4.6% | +30.8% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | -0.2% | +23.6% | +18.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.8% | -101.3% | +65.1% | -46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 68% valuation discount to RNW's 48.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.50x vs CWEN's 0.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $925M | $23.6B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $1.1B | $21.3B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.63x | -16.29x | 15.48x | 26.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.41x | 5.45x | 12.39x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.50x | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | — | 9.64x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 3.00x | 4.53x | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | — | 2.48x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.91x | 21.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWEN. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | — | +18.0% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -19.5% | +12.6% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | -5.3% | +17.6% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | -7.2% | +15.9% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.59x | — | 0.05x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $691.9B | $179M | -$2.3B | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40.4B | $10M | $2.8B | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $732.3B | $188M | $499M | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 86.76x | -1.57x | 53.51x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FSLR and CWEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $30,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, FSLR leads with a +64.4% total return vs SPWR's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWEN at 12.8% vs SPWR's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | -33.9% | -19.8% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | -37.7% | +64.4% | +39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.7% | -80.0% | +23.9% | +43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.3% | -80.0% | +204.7% | +78.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.5% | -80.0% | +334.7% | +237.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | -41.5% | +7.4% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 2.15x | 1.36x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $2.27 | $285.99 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.38 | $0.81 | $127.33 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.2% | +48.0% | +76.9% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 45.1 | 60.7 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 739K | 1.7M | 2.0M | 829K |
Analyst Outlook
CWEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNW as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1350.5% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 14.4% for CWEN (target: $44). CWEN is the only dividend payer here at 7.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.52 | $15.81 | $251.82 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 45 | 73 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CWEN leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RNW vs SPWR vs FSLR vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus ReNew Energy Global Plc at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, ReNew Energy Global Plc is actually cheaper at 0. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +204. 7%, compared to -80. 0% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning SPWR is approximately 287% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -10. 5% for SunPower Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53. 5% versus -2. 0% for SPWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNW leads at 91. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) trades at 0.
4x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for First Solar, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1350. 5% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. RNW, SPWR, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RNW or SPWR or FSLR or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 7. 9% yield, +237. 5% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 5%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RNW and SPWR and FSLR and CWEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RNW (Utilities) and SPWR (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWEN pays a dividend while RNW, SPWR, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.