Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ROCK vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
ROCK vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $5.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116M | $322M |
ROCK vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gibraltar Industrie… (ROCK) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROCK vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROCK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 19.5x)
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs ROCK's 40.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs ROCK's -13.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs ROCK's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs ROCK's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs ROCK's -33.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs ROCK's 0.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 10.4% |
ROCK vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ROCK vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 2.5x ROCK's $1.2B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROCK's 0.7%. On growth, ROCK holds the edge at +22.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $114M | $656M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.9% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ROCK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, ROCK trades at a 48% valuation discount to IBP's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs ROCK's 1.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.57x | 22.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.37x | 19.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.23x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 8.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.22x | 19.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $1 for ROCK. ROCK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs ROCK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +37.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.29x | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,486 for ROCK. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs ROCK's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs ROCK's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.0% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.8% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | +98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.1% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +650.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.2% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
IBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBP is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROCK's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBP currently trades 62.1% from its 52-week high vs ROCK's 50.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.08 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.25 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.1% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 330K | 344K |
Analyst Outlook
IBP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ROCK as "Buy" and IBP as "Hold". IBP is the only dividend payer here at 1.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $293.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +3.0% |
IBP leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROCK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ROCK vs IBP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROCK or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 2% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK). Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROCK or IBP?
On trailing P/E, Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
(ROCK) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Gibraltar Industries, Inc. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROCK or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +80. 6%, compared to -55. 1% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus ROCK's +40. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROCK or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Gibraltar Industries, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning ROCK is approximately 33% more volatile than IBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROCK or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -13. 2% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROCK or IBP?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 8. 6% for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 10. 8% for ROCK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBP leads at 34. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROCK or IBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Gibraltar Industries, Inc. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROCK or IBP?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ROCK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROCK or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 5% yield, +650. 1% 10Y return). Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +650. 1%, ROCK: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROCK and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROCK (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROCK is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IBP pays a dividend while ROCK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.