Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ROG vs TXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
ROG vs TXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.51B | $263.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $813M | $18.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $5.37B |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 35.3% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 37.8x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $15.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $3.23B |
ROG vs TXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Corporation (ROG) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROG vs TXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROG is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (37.7x vs 37.8x)
- +123.4% vs TXN's +83.2%
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs ROG's 122.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs ROG's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.7x vs 37.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs ROG's -6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs ROG's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 22-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.4% vs TXN's +83.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs ROG's -3.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.6% |
ROG vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ROG vs TXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 22.7x ROG's $813M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROG's -6.9%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $813M | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +35.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +29.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ROG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ROG's 22.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXN's 34.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $263.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $275.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.84x | 53.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.71x | 37.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.38x | 34.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 14.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 16.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.27x | 101.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ROG. ROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs ROG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | +32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$157M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.38x | 12.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXN five years ago would be worth $17,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,363 for ROG. Over the past 12 months, ROG leads with a +123.4% total return vs TXN's +83.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 23.0% vs ROG's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.9% | +64.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.4% | +83.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.7% | +86.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.4% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.4% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROG's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $143.81 | $292.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.17 | $152.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 77.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 199K | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ROG as "Buy" and TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for ROG (target: $150) vs -12.3% for TXN (target: $254). TXN is the only dividend payer here at 1.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.00 | $253.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.6% |
TXN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ROG vs TXN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROG or TXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 53. 1x trailing P/E (37. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Corporation (ROG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROG or TXN?
On forward P/E, Rogers Corporation is actually cheaper at 37.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROG or TXN?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) delivered a total return of +70.
9%, compared to -26. 4% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXN returned +471. 6% versus ROG's +117. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROG or TXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Rogers Corporation's 1. 24β — meaning ROG is approximately 12% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Corporation (ROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROG or TXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Instruments Incorporated grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -340. 0% for Rogers Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXN leads at -4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROG or TXN?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus -7. 6% for Rogers Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 6. 4% for ROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROG or TXN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rogers Corporation (ROG) trades at 37.
7x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for Texas Instruments Incorporated — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROG: 6. 7% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROG or TXN?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ROG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROG or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, ROG: +117. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROG and TXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TXN pays a dividend while ROG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.