Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ROLR vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
ROLR vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 29.1x |
| Total Debt | $807K | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $687M |
ROLR vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 116.4 | +16.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -26.6%, EPS growth 143.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.73, Low D/E 8.4%, current ratio 0.81x
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 29.1x)
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17
- Beta 1.17, current ratio 0.79x
- 5.8% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 29.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs ROLR's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs PENN's +31.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC -119.9% vs 1.8% |
ROLR vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 408.3x ROLR's $17M. ROLR is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $10.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | -3.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 0.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ROLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROLR delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. ROLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs ROLR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs PENN's +31.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | +46.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -73.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +60.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PENN is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $21.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 71.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.2% |
PENN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ROLR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
ROLR vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — ROLR or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 133% more volatile than PENN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — ROLR or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROLR leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — ROLR or PENN?
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
(ROLR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PENN leads at 3. 9% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROLR leads at 53. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is ROLR or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17)). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ROLR and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.