RPD vs TENB

For growth investors, Tenable Holdings, Inc.

(TENB) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). Rapid7, Inc. (RPD) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Rapid7, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Tenable Holdings, Inc.

(TENB) delivered a total return of -42. 4%, compared to -91. 2% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TENB returned -30. 5% versus RPD's -42. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rapid7, Inc.

(RPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Tenable Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning TENB is approximately 22% more volatile than RPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 143% versus 7% for Rapid7, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tenable Holdings, Inc.

(TENB) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 1. 9% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenable Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 3. 2% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for Rapid7, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TENB leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rapid7, Inc.

(RPD) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -3. 6% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RPD leads at 1. 3% versus 0. 1% for TENB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TENB leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Rapid7, Inc.

(RPD) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPD: 47. 0% to $9. 82.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rapid7, Inc.

(RPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RPD: -42. 8%, TENB: -30. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.