Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Banks - Regional
Auto - Parts
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Banks - Regional | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $460M | $688M | $315M | $300M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $428M | $151M | $22M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-29M | $11M | $-73M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 28.6% | 63.5% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.2% | 1.6% | 9.1% | -352.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.5x | 31.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $730K | $186M | $179M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194M | $105M | $116M | $30M |
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richtech Robotics I… (RR) | 100 | 61.8 | -38.2% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| SES AI Corporation (SES) | 100 | 43.6 | -56.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 4.07, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 107.45x
- Beta 4.07, current ratio 107.45x
- +28.8% vs MVST's +1.9%
MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
BRBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 6.2%
- -13.2% 10Y total return vs RR's -49.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 7.1% margin vs SES's -331.7%
SES is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 9.3% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.3% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs SES's -331.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RR's 4.07 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.8% vs MVST's +1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs SES's -26.3%, ROIC 2.0% vs -35.1% |
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BRBS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MVST leads 1 • RR leads 0 • SES leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST is the larger business by revenue, generating $428M annually — 86.6x RR's $5M. BRBS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SES's -3.3%. On growth, SES holds the edge at +15.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $428M | $151M | $22M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | $32M | $15M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$29M | $11M | -$73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $56M | $9M | -$58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +28.6% | +63.5% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +1.6% | +9.1% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -6.8% | +7.1% | -3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +13.1% | +2.5% | -2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | -15.0% | — | +15.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +119.2% | +2.6% | -6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BRBS's 25.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 110.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $460M | $688M | $315M | $300M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $769M | $378M | $278M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.31x | -23.67x | 31.27x | -4.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.50x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 110.15x | 25.17x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 91.21x | 1.61x | 2.09x | 14.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.68x | 1.13x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.27x | 84.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRBS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRBS delivers a 3.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-32 for SES. RR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRBS's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RR scores 5/9 vs SES's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | -7.4% | +3.1% | -32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | -2.9% | +0.4% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.7% | +0.9% | +2.0% | -35.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.5% | +1.2% | +0.5% | -29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.45x | 0.55x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$193M | $81M | $63M | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $194M | $105M | $116M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $730,000 | $186M | $179M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -158.47x | -16.53x | 0.23x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RR and MVST and BRBS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RR five years ago would be worth $5,029 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $925 for SES. Over the past 12 months, RR leads with a +28.8% total return vs MVST's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 21.4% vs RR's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.1% | -24.5% | -5.8% | -51.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | +1.9% | +20.5% | +3.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | +79.0% | -44.7% | -40.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | -81.5% | -68.6% | -90.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | -78.2% | -13.2% | -91.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.5% | +21.4% | -17.9% | -15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BRBS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RR's 4.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRBS currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs SES's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.07x | 2.42x | 0.52x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.43 | $7.12 | $4.79 | $3.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.71 | $1.37 | $3.25 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.5% | +29.9% | +71.8% | +24.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 50.9 | 40.8 | 37.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.4M | 4.0M | 379K | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RR as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", SES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 127.3% upside for RR (target: $6) vs 50.7% for SES (target: $1). BRBS is the only dividend payer here at 6.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $4.80 | — | $1.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.21 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.5% |
BRBS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MVST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RR vs MVST vs BRBS vs SES: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RR or MVST or BRBS or SES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SES AI Corporation (SES) is the stronger pick with 929.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RR or MVST or BRBS or SES?
Over the past 5 years, Richtech Robotics Inc.
Class B Common Stock (RR) delivered a total return of -49. 7%, compared to -90. 8% for SES AI Corporation (SES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRBS returned -13. 2% versus SES's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RR or MVST or BRBS or SES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock's 4. 07β — meaning RR is approximately 690% more volatile than BRBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 55% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RR or MVST or BRBS or SES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SES AI Corporation (SES) is pulling ahead at 929.
4% versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 135. 5% year-over-year, compared to -8. 3% for Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, MVST leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RR or MVST or BRBS or SES?
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -347. 8% for SES AI Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRBS leads at 9. 1% versus -393. 4% for SES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RR leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RR or MVST or BRBS or SES more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RR: 127.
3% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RR or MVST or BRBS or SES?
In this comparison, BRBS (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RR, MVST, SES do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RR or MVST or BRBS or SES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 6. 2% yield). SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRBS: -13. 2%, SES: -91. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RR and MVST and BRBS and SES?
These companies operate in different sectors (RR (Industrials) and MVST (Industrials) and BRBS (Financial Services) and SES (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SES is a small-cap high-growth stock. BRBS pays a dividend while RR, MVST, SES do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.