Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Engineering & Construction
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Engineering & Construction | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $3.18B | $6.42B | $10.40B | $5.66B | $9.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $4.09B | $7.47B | $11.56B | $17.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $1.84B | $448M | $-485M | $183M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 42.1% | 42.3% | 43.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 21.4% | 8.8% | 17.8% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 11.9x | 20.2x | — | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $3.27B | $2.04B | $26.34B | $56.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $353M | $229M | $887M | $2.06B |
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.98, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 365.7% 10Y total return vs STN's 283.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 45.0% margin vs CZR's -4.2%
- Beta 0.86 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage
STN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
CZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MGM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs STN's +0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs CZR's -1.5%, ROIC 12.3% vs 5.4% |
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZR leads 1 • STN leads 1 • BYD leads 1 • MGM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 8.8x RRR's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, STN holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.1B | $7.5B | $11.6B | $17.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $795M | $1.2B | $961M | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $1.8B | $448M | -$485M | $183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $610M | $388M | $805M | $538M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +42.1% | +42.3% | +43.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +21.4% | +8.8% | +17.8% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +45.0% | +6.0% | -4.2% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +4.7% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +2.0% | +10.9% | +2.7% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -6.8% | +46.7% | +11.1% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 92% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRR's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $6.4B | $10.4B | $5.7B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $9.3B | $11.7B | $31.1B | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.22x | 3.78x | 39.23x | -11.48x | 50.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.44x | 11.88x | 20.24x | — | 22.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.08x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.89x | 7.91x | 17.59x | 8.90x | 31.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.57x | 1.89x | 0.49x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.59x | 2.67x | 4.82x | 1.57x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.00x | 16.52x | 28.14x | 10.88x | 5.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. RRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRR scores 7/9 vs MGM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.6% | +91.8% | +13.9% | -12.6% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +27.9% | +5.5% | -1.5% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +12.3% | +10.4% | +5.4% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +15.1% | +13.0% | +7.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.25x | 0.69x | 7.15x | 17.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | $2.9B | $1.8B | $25.5B | $54.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $353M | $229M | $887M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $3.3B | $2.0B | $26.3B | $56.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 15.78x | 7.18x | 0.90x | 1.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STN five years ago would be worth $21,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, RRR leads with a +29.0% total return vs STN's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STN at 15.0% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | -0.9% | -5.1% | +17.9% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +21.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +24.2% | +52.2% | -38.6% | -12.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.3% | +30.1% | +113.8% | -73.7% | -4.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.9% | +365.7% | +283.5% | +302.6% | +81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +7.5% | +15.0% | -15.0% | -4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs RRR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.86x | 1.04x | 1.27x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.99 | $89.96 | $114.52 | $31.58 | $40.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.16 | $69.01 | $84.08 | $17.95 | $29.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +94.7% | +79.6% | +88.0% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 49.7 | 57.6 | 54.5 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 964K | 932K | 250K | 4.6M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RRR and STN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RRR as "Buy", BYD as "Buy", STN as "Hold", CZR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for RRR (target: $71) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, RRR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs STN's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.44 | $95.00 | $62.07 | $30.57 | $39.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 38 | 18 | 30 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.71 | $0.82 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +12.1% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +12.6% |
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs CZR vs MGM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.
(STN) delivered a total return of +113. 8%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus MGM's +81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 48% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -87. 6% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STN leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 5. 7% for MGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for MGM Resorts International — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 32. 9% to $71. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM?
In this comparison, RRR (2.
2% yield), BYD (0. 8% yield), STN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CZR, MGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RRR or BYD or STN or CZR or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, MGM: +81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRR and BYD and STN and CZR and MGM?
These companies operate in different sectors (RRR (Consumer Cyclical) and BYD (Consumer Cyclical) and STN (Industrials) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and MGM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RRR, BYD, STN pay a dividend while CZR, MGM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.