Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Engineering & Construction
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Engineering & Construction | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $3.18B | $6.42B | $10.40B | $2.24B | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $4.09B | $7.47B | $6.96B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $1.84B | $448M | $-843M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 42.1% | 42.3% | 30.6% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 21.4% | 8.8% | -7.9% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 11.9x | 20.2x | 23.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $58M | $3.27B | $2.04B | $8.38B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $353M | $229M | $687M | $887M |
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.98, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +29.0% vs STN's +0.5%
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- 365.7% 10Y total return vs STN's 283.5%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 23.0x)
- 45.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
STN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs STN's +0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs 1.8% |
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories
STN leads 1 • BYD leads 1 • PENN leads 0 • CZR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 5.7x RRR's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, STN holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.1B | $7.5B | $7.0B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $795M | $1.2B | $961M | -$105M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $1.8B | $448M | -$843M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $610M | $388M | $805M | -$169M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +42.1% | +42.3% | +30.6% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +21.4% | +8.8% | -7.9% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +45.0% | +6.0% | -12.1% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +9.5% | +10.8% | -2.4% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +2.0% | +10.9% | +8.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -6.8% | +46.7% | +37.5% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 90% valuation discount to STN's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRR's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STN's 17.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $6.4B | $10.4B | $2.2B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $9.3B | $11.7B | $9.9B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.22x | 3.78x | 39.23x | -2.88x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.44x | 11.88x | 20.24x | 22.95x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.08x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.89x | 7.91x | 17.59x | 13.81x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.57x | 1.89x | 0.32x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.59x | 2.67x | 4.82x | 1.33x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.00x | 16.52x | 28.14x | — | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. RRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRR scores 7/9 vs CZR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.6% | +91.8% | +13.9% | -34.7% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +27.9% | +5.5% | -5.7% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +12.3% | +10.4% | +1.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +15.1% | +13.0% | +2.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.25x | 0.69x | 4.58x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | $2.9B | $1.8B | $7.7B | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $353M | $229M | $687M | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $3.3B | $2.0B | $8.4B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 15.78x | 7.18x | -1.02x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STN five years ago would be worth $21,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, RRR leads with a +29.0% total return vs STN's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STN at 15.0% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | -0.9% | -5.1% | +12.9% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +21.2% | +0.5% | +6.7% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +24.2% | +52.2% | -35.3% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.3% | +30.1% | +113.8% | -80.6% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.9% | +365.7% | +283.5% | +11.9% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +7.5% | +15.0% | -13.5% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs RRR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.86x | 1.04x | 1.34x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.99 | $89.96 | $114.52 | $20.61 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.16 | $69.01 | $84.08 | $11.65 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +94.7% | +79.6% | +81.4% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 49.7 | 57.6 | 55.1 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 964K | 932K | 250K | 4.4M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RRR and STN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RRR as "Buy", BYD as "Buy", STN as "Hold", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for RRR (target: $71) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, RRR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs STN's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.44 | $95.00 | $62.07 | $19.88 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 38 | 18 | 47 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 13 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.71 | $0.82 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +12.1% | 0.0% | +15.8% | +4.0% |
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RRR vs BYD vs STN vs PENN vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Stantec Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.
(STN) delivered a total return of +113. 8%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +365. 7% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 56% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STN leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 32. 9% to $71. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR?
In this comparison, RRR (2.
2% yield), BYD (0. 8% yield), STN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PENN, CZR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RRR or BYD or STN or PENN or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +365. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +365. 7%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRR and BYD and STN and PENN and CZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (RRR (Consumer Cyclical) and BYD (Consumer Cyclical) and STN (Industrials) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RRR, BYD, STN pay a dividend while PENN, CZR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.