Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $3.18B | $10.40B | $8.00B | $6.42B | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $7.47B | $4.91B | $4.09B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $448M | $440M | $1.84B | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 42.3% | 19.5% | 42.1% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 8.8% | 12.4% | 21.4% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 20.2x | 20.0x | 11.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $58M | $2.04B | $987M | $3.27B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $229M | $167M | $353M | $887M |
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 194.5 | +94.5% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +29.0% vs TTEK's +0.2%
STN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- PEG 1.59 vs TTEK's 2.47
- 15.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
- PEG 1.59 vs 2.47
TTEK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.8%
- 450.1% 10Y total return vs BYD's 365.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.53, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.18x
BYD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 45.0% margin vs CZR's -4.2%
- 27.9% ROA vs CZR's -1.5%, ROIC 12.3% vs 5.4%
Among these 5 stocks, CZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Value | PEG 1.59 vs 2.47 | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs CZR's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs TTEK's +0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs CZR's -1.5%, ROIC 12.3% vs 5.4% |
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZR leads 1 • STN leads 1 • TTEK leads 0 • BYD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 5.7x RRR's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, STN holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $7.5B | $4.9B | $4.1B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $795M | $961M | $666M | $1.2B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $448M | $440M | $1.8B | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $610M | $805M | $669M | $388M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +42.3% | +19.5% | +42.1% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +8.8% | +12.4% | +21.4% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +6.0% | +9.0% | +45.0% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +10.8% | +13.6% | +9.5% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +10.9% | +10.6% | +2.0% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +46.7% | +16.8% | -6.8% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 90% valuation discount to STN's 39.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STN offers better value at 3.08x vs TTEK's 4.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $10.4B | $8.0B | $6.4B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $11.7B | $8.8B | $9.3B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.22x | 39.23x | 33.00x | 3.78x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.44x | 20.24x | 20.04x | 11.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.08x | 4.07x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.89x | 17.59x | 13.28x | 7.91x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.89x | 1.47x | 1.57x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.59x | 4.82x | 4.61x | 2.67x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.00x | 28.14x | 18.23x | 16.52x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. RRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRR scores 7/9 vs CZR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.6% | +13.9% | +24.4% | +91.8% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +5.5% | +10.2% | +27.9% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +10.4% | +17.4% | +12.3% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +13.0% | +20.6% | +15.1% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.69x | 0.55x | 1.25x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | $1.8B | $820M | $2.9B | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $229M | $167M | $353M | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $2.0B | $987M | $3.3B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 7.18x | 19.86x | 15.78x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STN five years ago would be worth $21,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, RRR leads with a +29.0% total return vs TTEK's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STN at 15.0% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | -5.1% | -8.6% | -0.9% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +0.5% | +0.2% | +21.2% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +52.2% | +11.5% | +24.2% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.3% | +113.8% | +28.0% | +30.1% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.9% | +283.5% | +450.1% | +365.7% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +15.0% | +3.7% | +7.5% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and BYD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs TTEK's 71.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.04x | 0.53x | 0.86x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.99 | $114.52 | $43.14 | $89.96 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.16 | $84.08 | $29.59 | $69.01 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +79.6% | +71.1% | +94.7% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 57.6 | 42.7 | 49.7 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 964K | 250K | 2.7M | 932K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RRR and STN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RRR as "Buy", STN as "Hold", TTEK as "Hold", BYD as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.2% upside for TTEK (target: $42) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, RRR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs STN's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.44 | $62.07 | $41.50 | $95.00 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 18 | 26 | 38 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.82 | $0.24 | $0.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +12.1% | +4.0% |
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RRR vs STN vs TTEK vs BYD vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Stantec Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stantec Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 47x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.
(STN) delivered a total return of +113. 8%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEK returned +450. 1% versus RRR's +251. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Caesars Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning CZR is approximately 137% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -87. 6% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 7. 9% for STN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stantec Inc. (STN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 47x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Stantec Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEK: 35. 2% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR?
In this comparison, RRR (2.
2% yield), BYD (0. 8% yield), TTEK (0. 8% yield), STN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CZR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RRR or STN or TTEK or BYD or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +450. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +450. 1%, CZR: +302. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRR and STN and TTEK and BYD and CZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (RRR (Consumer Cyclical) and STN (Industrials) and TTEK (Industrials) and BYD (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RRR, STN, TTEK, BYD pay a dividend while CZR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.