Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RRX vs GNRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
RRX vs GNRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $13.73B | $15.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $287M | $189M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.06B | $1.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $522M | $341M |
RRX vs GNRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regal Rexnord Corpo… (RRX) | 100 | 259.3 | +159.3% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRX vs GNRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.91, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth 43.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- Beta 1.91, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.15x
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs RRX's 257.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 50.5%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.69 vs RRX's 1.91, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs GNRC's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs RRX's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs RRX's +59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs RRX's 2.1%, ROIC 5.9% vs 4.5% |
RRX vs GNRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRX vs GNRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RRX and GNRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRX and GNRC operate at a comparable scale, with $6.0B and $4.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (RRX) to 4.4% (GNRC). On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $472M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $287M | $189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $419M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | +69.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 48.9x trailing earnings, RRX trades at a 51% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRX's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.7B | $15.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.3B | $16.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.88x | 99.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.31x | 30.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.40x | 34.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 5.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.37x | 58.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GNRC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNRC delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $4 for RRX. GNRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RRX's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRX scores 7/9 vs GNRC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $992M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $522M | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.04x | 4.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RRX five years ago would be worth $14,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs RRX's +59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNRC at 34.2% vs RRX's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +89.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.9% | +129.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +141.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | -18.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.1% | +666.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GNRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRX's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs RRX's 87.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $236.34 | $269.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $124.73 | $113.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.3% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 77.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 895K |
Analyst Outlook
RRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RRX as "Buy" and GNRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.4% upside for RRX (target: $218) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). RRX is the only dividend payer here at 0.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $217.50 | $271.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GNRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RRX vs GNRC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRX or GNRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is the stronger pick with -1.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) offers the better valuation at 48. 9x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRX or GNRC?
On trailing P/E, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is the cheapest at 48.
9x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Regal Rexnord Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRX or GNRC?
Over the past 5 years, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus RRX's +257. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRX or GNRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Regal Rexnord Corporation's 1. 91β — meaning RRX is approximately 13% more volatile than GNRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 74% for Regal Rexnord Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRX or GNRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is pulling ahead at -1.
6% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regal Rexnord Corporation grew EPS 43. 5% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RRX leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRX or GNRC?
Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRX leads at 11. 5% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRX or GNRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) trades at 19.
3x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRX: 5. 4% to $217. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRX or GNRC?
In this comparison, RRX (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GNRC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RRX or GNRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regal Rexnord Corporation (RRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +257. 1% 10Y return). Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RRX: +257. 1%, GNRC: +666. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRX and GNRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RRX pays a dividend while GNRC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.