Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RUN vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
RUN vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.17B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $568M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $14.89B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $98M |
RUN vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 28.2 | -71.8% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RUN vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 71.1% 10Y total return vs SOC's 38.2%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs SOC's 35.6%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.51
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 0.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs SOC's 35.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs SOC's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs RUN's 2.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.7% vs SOC's -32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs SOC's -24.4%, ROIC -0.5% vs -44.6% |
RUN vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RUN vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN and SOC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $541M | -$395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $568M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$326M | -$640M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -138.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SOC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.50x | -3.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.15x | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.98x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 2464.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-102 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | -102.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -24.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.99x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.6B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.9B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | -3.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,825 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,746 for RUN. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +81.7% total return vs SOC's -32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 9.7% vs RUN's -9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.0% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.7% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.4% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.1% | +38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.3% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RUN and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOC is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RUN currently trades 57.2% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 38.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.44 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.38 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +38.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.2M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RUN as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 41.4% for RUN (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.14 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RUN vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RUN or SOC a better buy right now?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RUN or SOC?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RUN or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to -72. 5% for Sunrun Inc. (RUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +86. 7% versus SOC's +32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RUN or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 91% more volatile than SOC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RUN or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc.
grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RUN or SOC?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOC leads at 0. 0% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RUN leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RUN or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for Sunrun Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 101. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RUN or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RUN or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Sunrun Inc. (RUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOC: +32. 4%, RUN: +86. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RUN and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.