RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-87.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-58.8%
ALKS
Alkermes plc
Biotechnology
Market Cap$5.90B
5Y Perf.+116.4%
NNBR
NN, Inc.
Conglomerates
Market Cap$139M
5Y Perf.-38.3%
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RVP | DBVT | ALKS | NNBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $139M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $435M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-168M | $153M | $-35M |
| Gross Margin | -6.9% | — | 65.4% | 2.3% |
| Operating Margin | -58.1% | — | 12.3% | -3.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 43.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22M | $70M | $211M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M | $1.12B | $11M |
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RVP
DBVT
ALKS
NNBR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retractable Technol… (RVP) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| NN, Inc. (NNBR) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ALKS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Retractable Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. DBVT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
RVP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 8.34x
- Beta 0.72, yield 1.1%, current ratio 8.34x
- Beta 0.72 vs NNBR's 2.04, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Momentum Pick
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs RVP's -6.3%
Best for: momentum
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Growth Play
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.2%, EPS growth -34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs NNBR's -75.7%
- -5.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 43.6x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NNBR
NN, Inc.
The Secondary Option
NNBR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ALKS | -5.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Value | ALKS | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 43.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | ALKS | 9.8% margin vs RVP's -22.9% |
| Stability / Safety | RVP | Beta 0.72 vs NNBR's 2.04, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RVP | 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +110.4% vs RVP's -6.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALKS | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLALKSLAGGINGDBVT
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
NNBR leads 1 • RVP leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
0leads
RVPRetractable Technolog…
0leads
NNBRNN, Inc.
1leads
ALKSAlkermes plc
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NNBRvs RVPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ALKS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ALKS7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NNBR3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RVP's -22.9%. On growth, RVP holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $0 | $1.6B | $435M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$112M | $212M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$168M | $153M | -$35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$151M | $392M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | — | +65.4% | +2.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.1% | — | +12.3% | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.9% | — | +9.8% | -8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.5% | — | +25.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.2% | — | +28.2% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.0% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -8.7% |
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALKS and NNBR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNBR's 19.0x.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $139M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $338M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.76x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -2.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 43.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | 19.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | — | 4.00x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | 19.16x |
Evenly matched — ALKS and NNBR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. RVP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNBR's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs NNBR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.4% | — | +18.9% | -4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.1% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M | $1.1B | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22M | $70M | $211M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.41x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -0.74x |
ALKS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $712 for RVP. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs RVP's -6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNBR at 40.7% vs RVP's -23.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | +4.9% | +25.3% | +106.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.3% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +50.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.4% | +19.7% | +14.5% | +178.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -63.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -75.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.6% | +6.2% | +4.6% | +40.7% |
NNBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVP and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NNBR's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs RVP's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.14 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $2.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $1.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.8% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 252K | 2.3M | 936K |
Evenly matched — RVP and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", NNBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44). RVP is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | NNBRNN, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $44.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 28 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NNBR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallAlkermes plc (ALKS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RVP vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NNBR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger pick with -5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 2% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -92. 9% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Retractable Technologies, Inc.
(RVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus NN, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NNBR is approximately 185% more volatile than RVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 144% for NN, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is pulling ahead at -5.
2% versus -24. 2% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NN, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -36. 0% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -63. 9% for RVP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR?
In this comparison, RVP (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT, ALKS, NNBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RVP or DBVT or ALKS or NNBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Retractable Technologies, Inc.
(RVP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), 1. 1% yield). NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVP: -69. 9%, NNBR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RVP and DBVT and ALKS and NNBR?
These companies operate in different sectors (RVP (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and ALKS (Healthcare) and NNBR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
RVP pays a dividend while DBVT, ALKS, NNBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.