Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RZC vs HLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
RZC vs HLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $10.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.41B | $2.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.18B | $448M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.71B | $438M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.17B | $971M |
RZC vs HLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.125% Fixed-Rate R… (RZC) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
| Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) | 100 | 171.8 | +71.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RZC vs HLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RZC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 42.1%
- PEG 0.06 vs HLI's 1.26
HLI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.8%, EPS growth 41.6%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs RZC's 25.3%
- 24.8% NII/revenue growth vs RZC's 3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.8% NII/revenue growth vs RZC's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 19.9x), PEG 0.06 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs RZC's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs HLI's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs HLI's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.3% vs HLI's -5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs RZC's 0.8%, ROIC 15.5% vs 8.3% |
RZC vs HLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RZC vs HLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RZC is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.4B annually — 9.8x HLI's $2.4B. HLI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RZC's 5.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.4B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $591M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $448M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $739M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +22.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RZC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, RZC trades at a 95% valuation discount to HLI's 26.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RZC offers better value at 0.06x vs HLI's 1.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $10.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.43x | 26.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.06x | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.05x | 18.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.42x | 13.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLI delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $9 for RZC. HLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RZC's 0.42x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +20.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$533M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $971M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $438M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HLI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLI five years ago would be worth $24,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,535 for RZC. Over the past 12 months, RZC leads with a +4.3% total return vs HLI's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HLI at 22.9% vs RZC's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | -5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +85.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +141.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +603.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
RZC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RZC is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLI's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RZC currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs HLI's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.29 | $211.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.01 | $134.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 606K |
Analyst Outlook
RZC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, RZC offers the higher dividend yield at 14.18% vs HLI's 1.57%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.2% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.60 | $2.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +0.5% |
HLI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RZC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
RZC vs HLI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RZC or HLI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the stronger pick with 24. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC). 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RZC or HLI?
On trailing P/E, 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the cheapest at 1. 4x versus Houlihan Lokey, Inc. at 26. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RZC or HLI?
Over the past 5 years, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) delivered a total return of +141. 5%, compared to +25. 3% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLI returned +603. 4% versus RZC's +25. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RZC or HLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Houlihan Lokey, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning HLI is approximately 691% more volatile than RZC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 42% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RZC or HLI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is pulling ahead at 24. 8% versus 3. 4% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to 41. 6% for Houlihan Lokey, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RZC or HLI?
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 5. 2% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLI leads at 21. 0% versus 6. 8% for RZC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — RZC or HLI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 1. 6% for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI).
08Is RZC or HLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RZC: +25. 3%, HLI: +603. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RZC and HLI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RZC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HLI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.