Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RZLT vs VNDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RZLT vs VNDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $295M | $378M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $218M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -73.6% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $85M |
RZLT vs VNDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rezolute, Inc. (RZLT) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 54.5 | -45.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RZLT vs VNDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RZLT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.79
- EPS growth 26.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 14.37x
VNDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -26.8% 10Y total return vs RZLT's -93.6%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs RZLT's -18.4%
- +45.9% vs RZLT's -14.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs RZLT's -18.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.1% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs VNDA's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.9% vs RZLT's -14.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -44.6% ROA vs RZLT's -60.8%, ROIC -32.2% vs -97.9% |
RZLT vs VNDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RZLT vs VNDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RZLT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNDA and RZLT operate at a comparable scale, with $218M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $218M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | -$127M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -110.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -64.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RZLT and VNDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $295M | $378M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $305M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.15x | -1.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RZLT and VNDA each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNDA delivers a -61.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-66 for RZLT. RZLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNDA's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RZLT scores 4/9 vs VNDA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.8% | -61.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.8% | -44.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -97.9% | -32.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.7% | -33.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RZLT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RZLT five years ago would be worth $4,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,578 for VNDA. Over the past 12 months, VNDA leads with a +45.9% total return vs RZLT's -14.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RZLT at 9.9% vs VNDA's -2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.7% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.4% | +45.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.6% | -7.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | -26.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | -2.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RZLT and VNDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RZLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNDA's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNDA currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs RZLT's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.46 | $9.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.0% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RZLT as "Buy" and VNDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 121.8% upside for VNDA (target: $14) vs 104.9% for RZLT (target: $6).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.33 | $14.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RZLT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
RZLT vs VNDA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RZLT or VNDA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RZLT or VNDA?
Over the past 5 years, Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) delivered a total return of -52. 5%, compared to -64. 2% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VNDA returned -26. 8% versus RZLT's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RZLT or VNDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning VNDA is approximately 32% more volatile than RZLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rezolute, Inc. (RZLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RZLT or VNDA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rezolute, Inc.
grew EPS 26. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RZLT or VNDA?
Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RZLT leads at 0. 0% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RZLT or VNDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RZLT or VNDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RZLT: -93. 6%, VNDA: -26. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RZLT and VNDA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.