Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
S vs CYBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
S vs CYBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $4.83B | $20.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-451M | $-147M |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 74.3% |
| Operating Margin | -32.1% | -7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 80.7x | 81.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $170M | $623M |
S vs CYBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SentinelOne, Inc. (S) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 330.7 | +230.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: S vs CYBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
S is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (80.7x vs 81.9x)
CYBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.92
- Rev growth 36.0%, EPS growth -38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.0%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs S's -63.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.0% revenue growth vs S's 21.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (80.7x vs 81.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -10.8% margin vs S's -45.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs S's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.9% vs S's -18.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs S's -18.8%, ROIC -3.2% vs -17.4% |
S vs CYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
S vs CYBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYBR and S operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.0B in trailing revenue. CYBR is the more profitable business, keeping -10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to S's -45.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$283M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$451M | -$147M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $259M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +74.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.1% | -7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.0% | -10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +83.2% |
Valuation Metrics
S leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $20.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.19x | -139.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.73x | 81.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 908.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 15.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.52x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 63.58x | 79.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBR delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-30 for S.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.8% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.8% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.4% | -3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.5% | -3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | $599M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $623M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $35,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,607 for S. Over the past 12 months, CYBR leads with a +12.9% total return vs S's -18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 43.4% vs S's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.2% | +12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.3% | +194.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | +252.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | +901.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than S's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYBR currently trades 77.7% from its 52-week high vs S's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $526.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.81 | $347.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.6% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.6M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates S as "Buy" and CYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.9% upside for S (target: $19) vs 12.3% for CYBR (target: $459).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.68 | $459.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.0% |
CYBR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). S leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
S vs CYBR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is S or CYBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger pick with 36. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Analysts rate SentinelOne, Inc. (S) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — S or CYBR?
Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) delivered a total return of +252. 5%, compared to -63. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 6% versus S's -63. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — S or CYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus SentinelOne, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning S is approximately 42% more volatile than CYBR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — S or CYBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is pulling ahead at 36. 0% versus 21. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc. (S). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CyberArk Software Ltd. grew EPS -38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, S leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — S or CYBR?
CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 8% net margin versus -45. 0% for SentinelOne, Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CYBR leads at -7. 7% versus -32. 1% for S. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYBR leads at 74. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is S or CYBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SentinelOne, Inc.
(S) trades at 80. 7x forward P/E versus 81. 9x for CyberArk Software Ltd. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for S: 21. 9% to $18. 68.
07Which pays a better dividend — S or CYBR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is S or CYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +901. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +901. 6%, S: -63. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between S and CYBR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.