REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $354M | $281M | $1.70B | $2.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $76M | $65M | $176M | $227M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $-10M | $-415K | $185K | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 97.7% | 87.4% | -4.1% | 92.4% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | 78.6% | 28.0% | 27.7% | 58.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | — | 59.3x | 64.8x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $0.00 | $394M | $0.00 | $1.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $27M | $5M | $14M | $13M |
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safehold Inc. (SAFE) | 100 | 27.8 | -72.2% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 112.7 | +12.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SAFE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LAND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GTY's 5.8%
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.3% vs SAFE's +1.1%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- PEG 1.11 vs SAFE's 1.44
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- Better valuation composite
GTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- 133.4% 10Y total return vs LAND's 42.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 29.85x
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.1% margin vs LAND's -13.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs SAFE's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GTY's 5.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs SAFE's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs LAND's -0.8%, ROIC 4.6% vs 4.9% |
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAND leads in 1 of 6 categories
SAFE leads 1 • PINE leads 1 • NTST leads 1 • GTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAND leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $386M annually — 6.0x PINE's $65M. GTY is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAND's -13.8%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $76M | $65M | $176M | $227M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $94M | $45M | $133M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | -$10M | -$415,000 | $185,000 | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $5M | -$46M | $106M | $131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.7% | +87.4% | -4.1% | +92.4% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +78.6% | +28.0% | +27.7% | +58.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | -13.8% | -0.6% | +0.1% | +40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +6.2% | -71.7% | +59.9% | +57.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +38.6% | +29.6% | +27.7% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +66.7% | +185.7% | +110.6% | +76.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SAFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, SAFE trades at a 96% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAFE offers better value at 1.53x vs NTST's 4.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $354M | $281M | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $327M | $671M | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.70x | -33.62x | -89.27x | 254.50x | 24.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.09x | — | 59.32x | 64.78x | 21.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.53x | — | — | 4.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 3.46x | 14.63x | 12.34x | 16.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 4.65x | 4.65x | 8.72x | 9.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 0.53x | 1.01x | 1.18x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.16x | 50.62x | — | 15.52x | 15.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LAND and GTY each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTY delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LAND. GTY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAFE's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -1.6% | -0.1% | +0.0% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -0.8% | -0.1% | +0.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +4.9% | +2.2% | +2.1% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +4.7% | +2.8% | +2.1% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | — | 1.31x | — | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | -$27M | $390M | -$14M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $27M | $5M | $14M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $0 | $394M | $0 | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.57x | 2.99x | 0.82x | — | 2.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,904 for SAFE. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs SAFE's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs SAFE's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +8.8% | +18.8% | +15.8% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | +11.2% | +37.3% | +32.6% | +23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | -27.5% | +46.6% | +27.0% | +12.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | -43.8% | +41.2% | +14.9% | +32.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +42.9% | +38.3% | +40.7% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | -10.2% | +13.6% | +8.3% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAFE's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs LAND's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.68x | 0.33x | 0.05x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.16 | $13.00 | $20.80 | $21.30 | $34.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $8.47 | $13.10 | $15.24 | $25.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +75.0% | +94.4% | +95.6% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 41.0 | 54.0 | 57.7 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 543K | 176K | 1.2M | 415K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LAND and GTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAFE as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", NTST as "Buy", GTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs -9.2% for SAFE (target: $14). For income investors, LAND offers the higher dividend yield at 6.74% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $10.00 | $20.75 | $22.03 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +6.7% | +0.2% | +4.1% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $0.66 | $0.04 | $0.83 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.0% | +0.1% |
LAND leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SAFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SAFE vs LAND vs PINE vs NTST vs GTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Safehold Inc. (SAFE) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safehold Inc. (SAFE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
On trailing P/E, Safehold Inc.
(SAFE) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Safehold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Safehold Inc. 's 1. 44x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -71. 0% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTY returned +133. 4% versus SAFE's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Safehold Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning SAFE is approximately 1845% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 184% for Safehold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 7% net margin versus -13. 8% for Gladstone Land Corporation — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAFE leads at 79. 8% versus 25. 7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Safehold Inc. 's 1. 44x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 55. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 8. 2% to $22. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is SAFE or LAND or PINE or NTST or GTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 5. 8% yield, +133. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +133. 4%, SAFE: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAFE and LAND and PINE and NTST and GTY?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAFE is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SAFE, LAND, NTST, GTY pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.