Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Software - Application
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense | Software - Application | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $20M | $398K | $98M | $10.69B | $4.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $5M | $40M | $78M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $-61M | $-3M | $-957M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 53.5% | 78.3% | 11.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | -9.5% | -7.9% | -10.2% | -2431.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $3M | $721K | $61M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $475K | $4M | $5M | $241M | $1.02B |
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 70.8 | -29.2% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 16.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- 27.6% ROA vs XTIA's -127.3%, ROIC 41.8% vs -177.5%
XTIA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.03
- Beta 1.03 vs ACHR's 2.95
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 3.5% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 96.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.84, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.84, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs XTIA's -29.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs XTIA's -29.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs ACHR's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.5% vs SAGT's -60.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.6% ROA vs XTIA's -127.3%, ROIC 41.8% vs -177.5% |
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XTIA leads in 1 of 6 categories
SAGT leads 1 • AEYE leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SAGT and XTIA and AEYE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOBY is the larger business by revenue, generating $78M annually — 258.9x ACHR's $300,000. SAGT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, XTIA holds the edge at +170.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $5M | $40M | $78M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | -$43M | -$504,000 | -$759M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | -$61M | -$3M | -$957M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$39M | $2M | -$661M | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +53.5% | +78.3% | +11.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | -9.5% | -7.9% | -10.2% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | -13.3% | -7.6% | -12.3% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.7% | -8.4% | +5.5% | -8.5% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +170.6% | +7.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +98.2% | +29.0% | -9.1% | +43.5% |
Valuation Metrics
XTIA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $397,588 | $98M | $10.7B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | -$635,412 | $93M | $10.5B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.20x | -0.01x | -31.44x | -9.62x | -6.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.27x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 0.12x | 2.42x | 200.04x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.45x | 0.06x | 20.31x | 6.37x | 1.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 90.30x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAGT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAGT delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-5 for XTIA. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XTIA's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAGT scores 7/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.1% | -5.0% | -47.8% | -74.2% | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +27.6% | -127.3% | -9.5% | -52.1% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.8% | -177.5% | -42.4% | -54.7% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +55.1% | -5.4% | -17.7% | -49.8% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.47x | 0.15x | 0.04x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$1M | -$5M | -$180M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $474,716 | $4M | $5M | $241M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $3M | $721,000 | $61M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 60.23x | -74.17x | -2.79x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JOBY and ACHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOBY five years ago would be worth $10,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XTIA. Over the past 12 months, JOBY leads with a +63.5% total return vs SAGT's -60.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 44.7% vs XTIA's -93.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.1% | +22.4% | -21.0% | -24.3% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.2% | +35.7% | -34.1% | +63.5% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -100.0% | +17.1% | +148.7% | +202.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -100.0% | -57.7% | +9.9% | -34.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -100.0% | +96.5% | +3.5% | -35.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.2% | -93.9% | +5.4% | +35.5% | +44.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAGT and JOBY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAGT is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JOBY currently trades 51.9% from its 52-week high vs XTIA's 23.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.33x | 1.03x | 2.18x | 2.84x | 2.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.54 | $7.43 | $16.39 | $20.95 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $1.22 | $5.31 | $6.42 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.3% | +23.6% | +48.0% | +51.9% | +44.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 39.9 | 66.5 | 58.9 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 2.1M | 195K | 24.5M | 27.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 41.9% for JOBY (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $15.42 | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
XTIA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SAGT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SAGT vs XTIA vs AEYE vs JOBY vs ACHR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 8% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) delivered a total return of +9. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus XTIA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
33β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning ACHR is approximately -982% more volatile than SAGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 47% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -29. 8% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XTI Aerospace, Inc. grew EPS 89. 7% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR?
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
3% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAGT leads at 18. 2% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SAGT or XTIA or AEYE or JOBY or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
33)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAGT: -56. 4%, ACHR: -35. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SAGT and XTIA and AEYE and JOBY and ACHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAGT (Technology) and XTIA (Industrials) and AEYE (Technology) and JOBY (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAGT is a small-cap high-growth stock; XTIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.