Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-64.1%
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.10B
5Y Perf.+13.6%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • BE
Market Cap$138.11B
5Y Perf.+71.2%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.05B
5Y Perf.-13.0%
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$408M
5Y Perf.-49.1%

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SAM logoSAM
TAP logoTAP
BUD logoBUD
STZ logoSTZ
MGPI logoMGPI
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$2.18B$8.10B$138.11B$26.05B$408M
Revenue (TTM)$2.09B$11.19B$119.82B$9.38B$521M
Net Income (TTM)$-61M$-2.11B$12.57B$1.11B$-240M
Gross Margin45.2%37.8%55.2%52.0%36.4%
Operating Margin-3.8%-20.3%31.7%34.5%-51.2%
Forward P/E20.6x9.2x18.8x12.7x12.1x
Total Debt$38M$6.30B$72.17B$12.11B$267M
Cash & Equiv.$223M$897M$11.17B$68M$18M

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SAM
TAP
BUD
STZ
MGPI
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10035.9-64.1%
Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP)100113.6+13.6%
Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD)100171.2+71.2%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10087.0-13.0%
MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI)10050.9-49.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TAP and BUD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. STZ and SAM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
  • 3.7% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Value Play

TAP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x)
  • 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BUD's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
The Momentum Pick

BUD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.

  • +24.5% vs MGPI's -38.0%
  • 6.0% ROA vs MGPI's -19.1%, ROIC 7.5% vs -6.7%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Income Pick

STZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 2.7%
  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
  • Beta 0.26, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.92x
  • 11.8% margin vs MGPI's -46.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MGPI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAM logoSAM3.7% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
ValueTAP logoTAPLower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x)
Quality / MarginsSTZ logoSTZ11.8% margin vs MGPI's -46.0%
Stability / SafetySTZ logoSTZBeta 0.26 vs MGPI's 0.63
DividendsTAP logoTAP4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BUD's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BUD logoBUD+24.5% vs MGPI's -38.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BUD logoBUD6.0% ROA vs MGPI's -19.1%, ROIC 7.5% vs -6.7%

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SAMThe Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TAPMolson Coors Beverage Company

Segment breakdown not available.

BUDAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
FY 2020
transportation services, lease agreements and advertising services
100.0%$13M
STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B
MGPIMGP Ingredients, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Spirits
43.4%$233M
Distilling Solutions
33.8%$181M
Ingredient Solutions
22.8%$122M

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSAMLAGGINGMGPI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TAP and BUD and STZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BUD is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.8B annually — 229.9x MGPI's $521M. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGPI's -46.0%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$11.2B$119.8B$9.4B$521M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M-$1.5B$38.8B$3.7B-$249M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$61M-$2.1B$12.6B$1.1B-$240M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$191M$1.2B$32.2B$1.8B$54M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.2%+37.8%+55.2%+52.0%+36.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.8%-20.3%+31.7%+34.5%-51.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.9%-18.9%+10.5%+11.8%-46.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.1%+10.4%+26.9%+18.8%+10.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.7%+2.0%+0.4%-9.8%-12.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.4%+35.6%+32.3%-15.0%-44.0%
Evenly matched — TAP and BUD and STZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TAP and MGPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.5x trailing earnings, SAM trades at a 27% valuation discount to BUD's 28.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BUD's 9.5x.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$8.1B$138.1B$26.1B$408M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$13.5B$199.1B$38.1B$656M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.50x-3.98x28.06x-333.89x-3.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.56x9.17x18.81x12.70x12.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.45x9.47x9.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.04x0.73x2.31x2.55x0.76x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x0.80x1.85x3.82x0.57x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.09x7.58x12.34x13.44x5.37x
Evenly matched — TAP and MGPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-32 for MGPI. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs MGPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.3%-18.6%+13.8%+13.9%-32.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.0%-8.9%+6.0%+5.1%-19.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.5%-10.1%+7.5%+13.0%-6.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.8%-11.6%+8.7%+18.0%-8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.60x0.81x1.70x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$186M$5.4B$61.0B$12.0B$248M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$223M$897M$11.2B$68M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$38M$6.3B$72.2B$12.1B$267M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.99x2.53x5.47x-40.23x
SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,818 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +24.5% total return vs MGPI's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUD at 8.4% vs MGPI's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.5%-8.0%+26.0%+7.9%-20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-15.9%-20.8%+24.5%-18.7%-38.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.0%-24.8%+27.5%-29.0%-79.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.8%-14.1%+12.4%-30.1%-66.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+32.0%-41.4%-24.5%+12.6%-17.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.4%-9.1%+8.4%-10.8%-41.3%
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TAP and BUD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGPI's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs MGPI's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.29x-0.01x0.28x0.26x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$264.46$57.57$82.91$196.91$34.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$185.34$40.64$56.97$126.45$16.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.7%+74.9%+96.8%+76.3%+54.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.747.270.745.947.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded199K2.9M2.0M1.8M279K
Evenly matched — TAP and BUD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SAM as "Hold", TAP as "Hold", BUD as "Buy", STZ as "Buy", MGPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 10.9% for BUD (target: $89). For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs BUD's 1.63%.

MetricSAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$246.86$48.30$89.00$175.70$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3137454614
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.5%+1.6%+2.7%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05042
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.92$1.31$4.03$0.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.4%+8.0%+0.7%+4.3%+0.3%
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SAM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BUD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallThe Boston Beer Company, In… (SAM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SAM vs TAP vs BUD vs STZ vs MGPI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

On trailing P/E, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the cheapest at 20. 5x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +12.

4%, compared to -81. 8% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +32. 0% versus TAP's -41. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

01β versus MGP Ingredients, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning MGPI is approximately -5308% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STZ leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

8% net margin versus -20. 1% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI?

In this comparison, TAP (4.

5% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SAM or TAP or BUD or STZ or MGPI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

01), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -41. 4%, SAM: +32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SAM and TAP and BUD and STZ and MGPI?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TAP, BUD, STZ, MGPI pay a dividend while SAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BUD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGPI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SAM and TAP and BUD and STZ and MGPI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SAM: 1.7% · TAP: 2.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.