Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $55M | $8.08B | $16.13B | $12.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125M | $2.45B | $8.77B | $6.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $717M | $812M | $-243M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 86.0% | 80.3% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 31.8% | 6.9% | -10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 8.8x | 11.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $2.69B | $13.30B | $10.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $586M | $3.57B | $1.98B |
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvercrest Asset M… (SAMG) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 454.5 | +354.5% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 164.5 | +64.5% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 346.2 | +246.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.2%, current ratio 13.97x
- Beta 0.76, yield 6.0%, current ratio 13.97x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
AMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- 89.4% 10Y total return vs SAMG's 58.2%
- 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs SAMG's 1.3%
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.4x)
BEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IVZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +92.7% vs SAMG's -12.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs SAMG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs IVZ's 1.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs BEN's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.7% vs SAMG's -12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% |
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAMG leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMG leads 2 • BEN leads 0 • IVZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 70.0x SAMG's $125M. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVZ's -4.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125M | $2.4B | $8.8B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $855M | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $717M | $812M | -$243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $978M | $938M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +86.0% | +80.3% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +31.8% | +6.9% | -10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +29.3% | +6.0% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +41.1% | +10.4% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.8% | +149.1% | +100.0% | +34.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SAMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, AMG trades at a 61% valuation discount to BEN's 34.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAMG's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEN's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $8.1B | $16.1B | $12.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $10.2B | $25.9B | $20.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.80x | 13.32x | 34.12x | -17.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.56x | 8.79x | 11.40x | 10.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.34x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.96x | 10.75x | 22.77x | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 3.30x | 1.84x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 2.26x | 1.13x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.95x | 8.04x | 17.70x | 8.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IVZ. SAMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs IVZ's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +16.0% | +5.6% | -1.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +8.0% | +2.5% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +8.1% | +1.6% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +8.6% | +2.0% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.61x | 0.94x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $2.1B | $9.7B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $586M | $3.6B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $2.7B | $13.3B | $10.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 83.82x | 9.69x | 15.19x | -6.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $17,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,712 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +92.7% total return vs SAMG's -12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMG at 28.7% vs SAMG's -3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.1% | +4.8% | +31.8% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.4% | +67.2% | +55.2% | +92.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | +113.3% | +37.3% | +84.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +74.0% | +7.1% | +11.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.2% | +89.4% | +24.9% | +24.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.6% | +28.7% | +11.2% | +22.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAMG and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVZ's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs SAMG's 78.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.11x | 1.29x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.99 | $334.78 | $31.44 | $29.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.79 | $172.54 | $20.59 | $14.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.5% | +90.4% | +98.8% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 53.9 | 71.2 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 345K | 5.0M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SAMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAMG as "Buy", AMG as "Buy", BEN as "Hold", IVZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for AMG (target: $403) vs -0.2% for BEN (target: $31). For income investors, SAMG offers the higher dividend yield at 6.03% vs IVZ's 3.01%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $402.50 | $31.00 | $29.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | 27 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +0.0% | +4.3% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.03 | $1.33 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +55.5% | +8.7% | +1.5% | +15.2% |
SAMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SAMG vs AMG vs BEN vs IVZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) delivered a total return of +74. 0%, compared to +7. 1% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMG returned +89. 4% versus IVZ's +24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
(SAMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 119% more volatile than SAMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 94% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 1. 3% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -4. 4% for Invesco Ltd. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMG leads at 31. 8% versus -10. 9% for IVZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMG: 32. 9% to $402. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ?
In this comparison, SAMG (6.
0% yield), BEN (4. 3% yield), IVZ (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SAMG or AMG or BEN or IVZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
(SAMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 6. 0% yield). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAMG: +58. 2%, IVZ: +24. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAMG and AMG and BEN and IVZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SAMG, BEN, IVZ pay a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.