Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SAMG vs DHIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
SAMG vs DHIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $54M | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 96.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 38.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $6.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $42M |
SAMG vs DHIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvercrest Asset M… (SAMG) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAMG vs DHIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAMG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 6.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DHIL's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- 6.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs DHIL's 5.7%
DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 14.4%
- 52.8% 10Y total return vs SAMG's 51.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% NII/revenue growth vs SAMG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DHIL's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SAMG's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs DHIL's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.2% vs SAMG's -11.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DHIL's 0.6% |
SAMG vs DHIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SAMG vs DHIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL and SAMG operate at a comparable scale, with $158M and $125M in trailing revenue. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAMG's 11.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $44.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +96.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +38.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.8% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SAMG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, DHIL trades at a 58% valuation discount to SAMG's 23.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAMG's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHIL's 110.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.54x | 9.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.43x | 9.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.91x | 110.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAMG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $14 for SAMG. SAMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 36.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 83.82x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DHIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHIL five years ago would be worth $12,868 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,700 for SAMG. Over the past 12 months, DHIL leads with a +35.2% total return vs SAMG's -11.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DHIL at 7.0% vs SAMG's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.1% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.4% | +35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +22.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | +52.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAMG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SAMG's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.99 | $175.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.79 | $114.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
SAMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SAMG offers the higher dividend yield at 6.10% vs DHIL's 5.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $9.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +56.2% | +3.6% |
DHIL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SAMG leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
SAMG vs DHIL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAMG or DHIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAMG or DHIL?
On trailing P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. at 23. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAMG or DHIL?
Over the past 5 years, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) delivered a total return of +28. 7%, compared to +17. 0% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DHIL returned +52. 8% versus SAMG's +51. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAMG or DHIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning SAMG is approximately 45% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAMG or DHIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus 1. 3% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. grew EPS 14. 4% year-over-year, compared to -44. 0% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAMG or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus 11. 2% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus 7. 4% for SAMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAMG or DHIL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAMG or DHIL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 5. 7% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL).
09Is SAMG or DHIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +52. 8%, SAMG: +51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAMG and DHIL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.