Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SAN vs DB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SAN vs DB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $182.01B | $61.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119.89B | $60.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14.10B | $6.93B |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $496.64B | $254.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $179.30B | $171.62B |
SAN vs DB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banco Santander, S.… (SAN) | 100 | 568.8 | +468.8% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 381.2 | +281.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAN vs DB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.7%, EPS growth 13.0%
- 223.0% 10Y total return vs DB's 102.7%
- NIM 2.3% vs DB's 1.1%
DB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.48
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, current ratio 0.50x
- Beta 1.48, current ratio 0.50x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.7% NII/revenue growth vs DB's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs DB's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs SAN's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.6% vs DB's +22.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs DB's 0.3% |
SAN vs DB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.9B annually — 2.0x DB's $60.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.8% (SAN) to 11.4% (DB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119.9B | $60.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22.4B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14.1B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12.3B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, DB trades at a 27% valuation discount to SAN's 12.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DB's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAN's 21.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $182.0B | $61.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $554.4B | $158.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.14x | 8.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.43x | 9.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.61x | 13.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAN delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for DB. DB carries lower financial leverage with a 3.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAN's 4.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DB scores 5/9 vs SAN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.40x | 3.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $317.3B | $83.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $179.3B | $171.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $496.6B | $254.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.24x | 0.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAN five years ago would be worth $34,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,382 for DB. Over the past 12 months, SAN leads with a +76.6% total return vs DB's +22.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAN at 55.4% vs DB's 46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | -19.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.6% | +22.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.3% | +215.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +242.7% | +143.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.0% | +102.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.4% | +46.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAN and DB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DB is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAN's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAN currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs DB's 79.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.24 | $40.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.14 | $26.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +79.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.7M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
DB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SAN as "Buy" and DB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -53.6% upside for DB (target: $15) vs -75.8% for SAN (target: $3).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $14.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SAN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SAN vs DB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAN or DB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banco Santander, S.
A. (SAN) is the stronger pick with -7. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Deutsche Bank AG (DB) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Santander, S. A. (SAN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAN or DB?
On trailing P/E, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the cheapest at 8.
8x versus Banco Santander, S. A. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAN or DB?
Over the past 5 years, Banco Santander, S.
A. (SAN) delivered a total return of +242. 7%, compared to +143. 8% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAN returned +223. 0% versus DB's +102. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAN or DB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
48β versus Banco Santander, S. A. 's 1. 48β — meaning SAN is approximately 0% more volatile than DB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Banco Santander, S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAN or DB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Santander, S.
A. (SAN) is pulling ahead at -7. 7% versus -8. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to 13. 0% for Banco Santander, S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAN or DB?
Banco Santander, S.
A. (SAN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 11. 4% for Deutsche Bank AG — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DB leads at 16. 0% versus 15. 6% for SAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DB leads at 49. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAN or DB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Banco Santander, S. A. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DB: -53. 6% to $14. 87.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAN or DB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SAN or DB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Santander, S.
A. (SAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+223. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAN: +223. 0%, DB: +102. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAN and DB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.