Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SANG vs NTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
SANG vs NTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $139M | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $861M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $96M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 79.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $457M |
SANG vs NTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sangoma Technologie… (SANG) | 100 | 291.0 | +191.0% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SANG vs NTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16
- Rev growth -0.9%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 20.0% 10Y total return vs NTCT's 66.6%
NTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- -0.8% revenue growth vs SANG's -0.9%
- 11.1% margin vs SANG's -2.5%
- +80.5% vs SANG's -27.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.8% revenue growth vs SANG's -0.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.1% margin vs SANG's -2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs NTCT's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs SANG's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs SANG's -2.2%, ROIC -19.3% vs -0.4% |
SANG vs NTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SANG vs NTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTCT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $861M annually — 2.8x SANG's $307M. NTCT is the more profitable business, keeping 11.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SANG's -2.5%. On growth, NTCT holds the edge at -0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $861M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $96M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $275M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +79.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SANG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.99x | -7.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.96x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.22x | 13.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTCT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTCT delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SANG. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SANG's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 6/9 vs SANG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.4% | -19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $457M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.29x | 55.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTCT five years ago would be worth $14,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,507 for SANG. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs SANG's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTCT at 9.2% vs SANG's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | +42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | +80.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +30.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +42.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1995.0% | +66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.4% | +9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SANG and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTCT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SANG's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.49 | $39.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.63 | $19.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 552K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SANG as "Buy" and NTCT as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +0.9% |
NTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SANG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SANG vs NTCT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SANG or NTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) is the stronger pick with -0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG). Analysts rate Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SANG or NTCT?
Over the past 5 years, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to +25. 1% for Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SANG returned +1995% versus NTCT's +66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SANG or NTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus NetScout Systems, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning NTCT is approximately 619% more volatile than SANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 22% for Sangoma Technologies Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SANG or NTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) is pulling ahead at -0. 8% versus -0. 9% for Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sangoma Technologies Corporation grew EPS 40. 5% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SANG leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SANG or NTCT?
Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the more profitable company, earning -2.
1% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SANG leads at -0. 5% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SANG or NTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SANG or NTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), +1995% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SANG: +1995%, NTCT: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SANG and NTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.