Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+579.9%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+3.6%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.+969.8%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SB logoSB
GNK logoGNK
SBLK logoSBLK
NMM logoNMM
SHIP logoSHIP
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$730M$1.10B$3.09B$2.07B$342M
Revenue (TTM)$275M$114.70B$1.04B$1.31B$153M
Net Income (TTM)$46M$9.32B$84M$262M$15M
Gross Margin36.9%62.9%33.0%56.7%45.4%
Operating Margin26.0%0.0%13.6%28.2%23.4%
Forward P/E12.6x14.9x8.0x4.8x6.9x
Total Debt$537M$200M$1.07B$1.42B$290M
Cash & Equiv.$84M$56M$500M$270M$63M

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SB
GNK
SBLK
NMM
SHIP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100679.9+579.9%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100534.1+434.1%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100526.7+426.7%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)1001069.8+969.8%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10082.6-17.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Safe Bulkers, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SHIP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
  • 8.2% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

GNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Value Play

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.8x vs 6.9x)
  • 19.9% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
  • Beta 0.72 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
  • 4.4% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.2%
Best for: value and quality
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick

SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSB logoSB8.2% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueNMM logoNMMLower P/E (4.8x vs 6.9x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
Stability / SafetyNMM logoNMMBeta 0.72 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
DividendsSB logoSB4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.2%

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 750.7x SHIP's $153M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBLK's 8.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$275M$114.7B$1.0B$1.3B$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$131M$112M$311M$693M$68M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$46M$9.3B$84M$262M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$55M$15.2B$209M$30M-$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.9%+62.9%+33.0%+56.7%+45.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+0.0%+13.6%+28.2%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.8%+8.1%+8.1%+19.9%+9.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%+13.3%+20.0%+2.3%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%+1604.6%-2.7%+1.8%+18.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-31.8%+175.0%+58.3%-40.6%+84.4%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 84% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Market CapShares × price$730M$1.1B$3.1B$2.1B$342M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$1.2B$3.7B$3.2B$570M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.36x-252.10x36.73x5.97x16.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.61x14.93x8.00x4.81x6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.96x14.38x11.87x4.85x7.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.37x3.21x2.97x1.55x2.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x1.22x1.26x0.69x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.73x20.11x
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.6%+4.2%+3.4%+8.1%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+3.0%+2.2%+4.4%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+0.7%+3.2%+8.3%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+0.9%+4.0%+9.0%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973573
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.22x0.44x0.46x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$453M$145M$572M$1.2B$228M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$84M$56M$500M$270M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$537M$200M$1.1B$1.4B$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.34x0.00x2.08x2.78x1.68x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,564 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+44.6%+39.4%+40.3%+39.4%+79.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+110.5%+94.4%+83.1%+99.4%+207.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+105.9%+103.0%+60.6%+216.8%+282.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+94.6%+95.4%+79.1%+120.5%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+765.0%+401.1%+977.3%+267.2%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.2%+26.6%+17.1%+46.9%+56.3%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.98x1.00x0.73x0.72x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.20$26.09$27.20$77.90$16.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.33$12.66$14.79$35.05$5.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.3%+96.6%+98.6%+91.9%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.063.072.857.262.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded576K415K1.4M166K258K
Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SB as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", NMM as "Hold", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs NMM's 0.29%.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.20$20.50$29.00$85.00$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts222224143
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.0%+3.0%+1.1%+0.3%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.27$0.76$0.30$0.20$0.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.0%0.0%+3.2%+1.2%0.0%
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SB vs GNK vs SBLK vs NMM vs SHIP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 68% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

09

Is SB or GNK or SBLK or NMM or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SB and GNK and SBLK and NMM and SHIP?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. SB, GNK, SBLK, SHIP pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SB and GNK and SBLK and NMM and SHIP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SB: -3.7% · GNK: 160459.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(SB: 16.8% · GNK: 8.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.