Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+579.9%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+3.6%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.+969.8%
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.58B
5Y Perf.+20.1%

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SB logoSB
SBLK logoSBLK
GNK logoGNK
NMM logoNMM
SFL logoSFL
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$730M$3.09B$1.10B$2.07B$1.58B
Revenue (TTM)$275M$1.04B$114.70B$1.31B$720M
Net Income (TTM)$46M$84M$9.32B$262M$-26M
Gross Margin36.9%33.0%62.9%56.7%33.2%
Operating Margin26.0%13.6%0.0%28.2%23.7%
Forward P/E12.6x8.0x14.9x4.8x351.3x
Total Debt$537M$1.07B$200M$1.42B$2.57B
Cash & Equiv.$84M$500M$56M$270M$151M

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SB
SBLK
GNK
NMM
SFL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100679.9+579.9%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100526.7+426.7%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100534.1+434.1%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)1001069.8+969.8%
SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL)100120.1+20.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Safe Bulkers, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SFL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Growth Play

SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • 8.2% revenue growth vs SFL's -19.3%
  • +110.5% vs SFL's +55.1%
Best for: growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Value Play

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.8x vs 14.9x)
  • 19.9% margin vs SFL's -3.7%
  • 4.4% ROA vs SFL's -0.7%, ROIC 8.3% vs 2.8%
Best for: value and quality
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
The Income Pick

SFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 7.9%
  • Beta 0.67, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.36x
  • Beta 0.67 vs GNK's 1.00
  • 7.9% yield, vs SB's 4.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSB logoSB8.2% revenue growth vs SFL's -19.3%
ValueNMM logoNMMLower P/E (4.8x vs 14.9x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs SFL's -3.7%
Stability / SafetySFL logoSFLBeta 0.67 vs GNK's 1.00
DividendsSFL logoSFL7.9% yield, vs SB's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)SB logoSB+110.5% vs SFL's +55.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs SFL's -0.7%, ROIC 8.3% vs 2.8%

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M
NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

SFLSFL Corporation Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 417.6x SB's $275M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFL's -3.7%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$275M$1.0B$114.7B$1.3B$720M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$131M$311M$112M$693M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$46M$84M$9.3B$262M-$26M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$55M$209M$15.2B$30M$220M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.9%+33.0%+62.9%+56.7%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+13.6%+0.0%+28.2%+23.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.8%+8.1%+8.1%+19.9%-3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%+20.0%+13.3%+2.3%+30.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%-2.7%+1604.6%+1.8%-24.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-31.8%+58.3%+175.0%-40.6%-123.3%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 84% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
Market CapShares × price$730M$3.1B$1.1B$2.1B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$3.7B$1.2B$3.2B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.36x36.73x-252.10x5.97x-59.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.61x8.00x14.93x4.81x351.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.96x11.87x14.38x4.85x10.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.37x2.97x3.21x1.55x2.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x1.26x1.22x0.69x1.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.73x7.20x
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SFL. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFL's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs SFL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.6%+3.4%+4.2%+8.1%-2.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+2.2%+3.0%+4.4%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+3.2%+0.7%+8.3%+2.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+4.0%+0.9%+9.0%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975373
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.44x0.22x0.46x2.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$453M$572M$145M$1.2B$2.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$84M$500M$56M$270M$151M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$537M$1.1B$200M$1.4B$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.34x2.08x0.00x2.78x1.18x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, SB leads with a +110.5% total return vs SFL's +55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+44.6%+40.3%+39.4%+39.4%+53.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+110.5%+83.1%+94.4%+99.4%+55.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+105.9%+60.6%+103.0%+216.8%+67.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+94.6%+79.1%+95.4%+120.5%+102.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+765.0%+977.3%+401.1%+267.2%+56.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.2%+17.1%+26.6%+46.9%+18.8%
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SFL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SFL is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.98x0.73x1.00x0.72x0.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.20$27.20$26.09$77.90$11.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.33$14.79$12.66$35.05$6.73
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.3%+98.6%+96.6%+91.9%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.072.863.057.271.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded576K1.4M415K166K1.3M
SFL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SB and NMM and SFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SB as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", NMM as "Hold", SFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for SFL (target: $15) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SFL offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs NMM's 0.29%.

MetricSB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…SFL logoSFLSFL Corporation L…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.20$29.00$20.50$85.00$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts222422149
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.0%+1.1%+3.0%+0.3%+7.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.27$0.30$0.76$0.20$0.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.0%+3.2%0.0%+1.2%+0.6%
Evenly matched — SB and NMM and SFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM vs SFL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SFL's +56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SFL Corporation Ltd.

(SFL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Genco Shipping & Trading Limited's 1. 00β — meaning GNK is approximately 49% more volatile than SFL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for SFL Corporation Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -3. 7% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 351. 3x for SFL Corporation Ltd. — 346. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFL: 21. 7% to $14. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

09

Is SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM or SFL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, NMM: +267. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SB and SBLK and GNK and NMM and SFL?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SB, SBLK, GNK, SFL pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SB and SBLK and GNK and NMM and SFL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SB: -3.7% · SBLK: -2.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(SB: 16.8% · SBLK: 8.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SB: 8.4x · SBLK: 36.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.