Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-97.3%
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-69.0%
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.71B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.08B
5Y Perf.-56.2%
MGM
MGM Resorts International

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.92B
5Y Perf.+88.6%

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBET logoSBET
PENN logoPENN
CZR logoCZR
GENI logoGENI
MGM logoMGM
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosInternet Content & InformationGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$1.46B$2.24B$5.71B$1.08B$9.92B
Revenue (TTM)$28M$6.96B$11.56B$713M$17.72B
Net Income (TTM)$-735M$-843M$-485M$-159M$183M
Gross Margin93.2%30.6%43.9%22.6%44.2%
Operating Margin-20.0%-7.9%17.8%-18.3%5.2%
Forward P/E6.1x22.8x161.2x21.5x
Total Debt$0.00$8.38B$26.34B$30M$56.16B
Cash & Equiv.$29M$687M$887M$281M$2.06B

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBET
PENN
CZR
GENI
MGM
StockOct 20May 26Return
SharpLink Gaming Lt… (SBET)1002.7-97.3%
PENN Entertainment,… (PENN)10031.0-69.0%
Caesars Entertainme… (CZR)10062.6-37.4%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10043.8-56.2%
MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM)100188.6+88.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBET leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MGM Resorts International is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CZR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
The Growth Play

SBET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 53.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.3%
  • 6.7% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
  • Lower P/E (6.1x vs 161.2x)
  • +134.7% vs GENI's -56.9%
Best for: growth exposure
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
The Income Pick

CZR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
  • 306.4% 10Y total return vs MGM's 84.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 0.80x
  • Beta 1.24, current ratio 0.80x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GENI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
MGM
MGM Resorts International
The Quality Compounder

MGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 1.0% margin vs SBET's -26.2%
  • 0.4% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -35.2%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSBET logoSBET6.7% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
ValueSBET logoSBETLower P/E (6.1x vs 161.2x)
Quality / MarginsMGM logoMGM1.0% margin vs SBET's -26.2%
Stability / SafetyCZR logoCZRBeta 1.24 vs SBET's 3.41
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SBET logoSBET+134.7% vs GENI's -56.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MGM logoMGM0.4% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -35.2%

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBETSharpLink Gaming Ltd.
FY 2025
Affiliate Marketing Services
100.0%$2M
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
76.9%$5.3B
Product and Service, Other
13.1%$912M
Food and Beverage
6.4%$446M
Occupancy
3.6%$253M
CZRCaesars Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
64.4%$6.6B
Hotel, Owned
18.9%$1.9B
Food and Beverage
16.7%$1.7B
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M
MGMMGM Resorts International
FY 2025
Casino
53.9%$9.5B
Occupancy
19.3%$3.4B
Food And Beverage
17.4%$3.0B
Entertainment Retail And Other
9.5%$1.7B

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBETLAGGINGCZR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 631.4x SBET's $28M. MGM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBET's -26.2%. On growth, SBET holds the edge at +18.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$28M$7.0B$11.6B$713M$17.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$561M-$105M$3.5B-$54M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$735M-$843M-$485M-$159M$183M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$169M$538M$16M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.2%+30.6%+43.9%+22.6%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-20.0%-7.9%+17.8%-18.3%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.2%-12.1%-4.2%-22.3%+1.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-65.1%-2.4%+4.7%+2.2%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+8.2%+2.7%+30.5%+4.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.3%+37.5%+11.1%-6.0%-5.9%
SBET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SBET and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.7x.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$2.2B$5.7B$1.1B$9.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$9.9B$31.2B$834M$64.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.01x-2.87x-11.59x-10.00x51.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.10x22.79x161.17x21.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.81x8.92x31.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue52.16x0.32x0.50x1.62x0.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.60x1.32x1.58x1.55x3.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.98x16.79x5.95x
Evenly matched — SBET and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SBET. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-49.5%-34.7%-12.6%-22.2%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-49.3%-5.7%-1.5%-15.4%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-35.2%+1.8%+5.4%-16.6%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.3%+2.0%+7.0%-15.3%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935535
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.58x7.15x0.04x17.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$29M$7.7B$25.5B-$250M$54.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$687M$887M$281M$2.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$8.4B$26.3B$30M$56.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.02x0.90x-75.96x1.52x
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CZR and GENI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,835 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $117 for SBET. Over the past 12 months, SBET leads with a +134.7% total return vs GENI's -56.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 2.7% vs SBET's -42.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.2%+12.7%+19.0%-59.2%+6.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+134.7%+9.5%+0.8%-56.9%+20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.4%-35.4%-38.1%+8.4%-10.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-79.4%-73.2%-76.5%-1.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%+11.7%+306.4%-56.0%+84.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.9%-13.6%-14.8%+2.7%-3.7%
Evenly matched — CZR and GENI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CZR and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZR is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBET's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SBET's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.41x1.31x1.24x1.39x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$124.12$20.61$31.58$13.73$40.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.41$11.65$17.95$3.83$29.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.0%+81.2%+88.8%+32.0%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.955.354.654.849.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.9M4.2M4.3M5.6M4.3M
Evenly matched — CZR and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SBET as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", GENI as "Buy", MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $11) vs 2.4% for MGM (target: $40).

MetricSBET logoSBETSharpLink Gaming …PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$20.29$30.57$11.17$39.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts347301936
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+15.9%+4.0%0.0%+12.4%
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SBET leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MGM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallSharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBET vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs MGM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) is the stronger pick with 666. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 51. 0x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

On forward P/E, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -1.

7%, compared to -98. 8% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +306. 4% versus SBET's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus SharpLink Gaming Ltd. 's 3. 41β — meaning SBET is approximately 176% more volatile than CZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) is pulling ahead at 666. 0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharpLink Gaming Ltd. grew EPS 53. 7% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBET leads at 100. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

2% net margin versus -26. 2% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -1999. 5% for SBET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBET leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

(SBET) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 161. 2x for Genius Sports Limited — 155. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $11. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SBET or PENN or CZR or GENI or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +306. 4% 10Y return). SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZR: +306. 4%, SBET: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBET and PENN and CZR and GENI and MGM?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBET (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and MGM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBET is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SBET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 907%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GENI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SBET and PENN and CZR and GENI and MGM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SBET: 1815.4% · PENN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.