SBEV
Splash Beverage Group, Inc.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Market Cap$387K
5Y Perf.-99.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SBEV vs MNST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$74.29B
5Y Perf.+111.3%
SBEV vs MNST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SBEV | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $387K | $74.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $8.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $1.91B |
| Gross Margin | -168.7% | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | -19.2% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.7x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15K | $2.09B |
SBEV vs MNST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SBEV
MNST
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splash Beverage Gro… (SBEV) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBEV vs MNST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MNST leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SBEV
Splash Beverage Group, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, SBEV is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
The Income Pick
MNST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.26
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 206.3% 10Y total return vs SBEV's -99.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNST | 10.7% revenue growth vs SBEV's -78.0% |
| Quality / Margins | MNST | 23.0% margin vs SBEV's -30.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MNST | Beta 0.26 vs SBEV's 2.87 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNST | +25.4% vs SBEV's -96.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNST | 20.8% ROA vs SBEV's -138.2% |
SBEV vs MNST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
SBEV vs MNST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMNSTLAGGINGSBEV
SBEVSplash Beverage Group…
1leads
MNSTMonster Beverage Corp…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBEVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MNST6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SBEV2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MNST6/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MNST6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MNST2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNST is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 8098.7x SBEV's $1M. MNST is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBEV's -30.3%. On growth, MNST holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -168.7% | +55.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +23.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -173.5% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +64.3% |
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SBEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $387,068 | $74.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $72.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 39.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 8.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.79x |
SBEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNST delivers a 25.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SBEV. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNST scores 7/9 vs SBEV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.6% | +25.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.2% | +20.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +33.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +31.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15,346 | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.14x | 372.36x |
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNST five years ago would be worth $16,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for SBEV. Over the past 12 months, MNST leads with a +25.4% total return vs SBEV's -96.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNST at 8.8% vs SBEV's -83.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -68.7% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.5% | +25.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +206.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.4% | +8.8% |
MNST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNST is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBEV's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNST currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs SBEV's 3.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.79 | $87.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $58.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.4% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.6 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 5.2M |
MNST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SBEVSplash Beverage G… | MNSTMonster Beverage … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $85.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MNST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBEV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallMonster Beverage Corporation (MNST)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SBEV vs MNST: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBEV or MNST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the stronger pick with 10.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 0% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (33. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SBEV or MNST?
Over the past 5 years, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -99. 9% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNST returned +206. 3% versus SBEV's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SBEV or MNST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus Splash Beverage Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning SBEV is approximately 1012% more volatile than MNST relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SBEV or MNST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is pulling ahead at 10.
7% versus -78. 0% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monster Beverage Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNST leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SBEV or MNST?
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
0% net margin versus -571. 7% for Splash Beverage Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNST leads at 29. 2% versus -386. 2% for SBEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNST leads at 55. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SBEV or MNST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SBEV or MNST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), +206. 3% 10Y return). Splash Beverage Group, Inc. (SBEV) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNST: +206. 3%, SBEV: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SBEV and MNST?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SBEV: -100.0% · MNST: 17.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.