Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBFG vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SBFG vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $273M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 19.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $161M |
SBFG vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB Financial Group,… (SBFG) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBFG vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.6%
- PEG 2.94 vs FXNC's 8.59
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.6%, current ratio 3.66x
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs SBFG's 167.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs SBFG's 11.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.8x), PEG 2.94 vs 8.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs SBFG's 0.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs SBFG's +30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
SBFG vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBFG vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC and SBFG operate at a comparable scale, with $115M and $91M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (FXNC) to 15.4% (SBFG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SBFG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 31% valuation discount to FXNC's 15.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBFG offers better value at 3.32x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $273M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $155M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 15.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.44x | 12.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.32x | 10.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.85x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBFG delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $10 for FXNC. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBFG's 0.53x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $17,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,484 for SBFG. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs SBFG's +30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 26.8% vs SBFG's 25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +103.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +71.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.5% | +258.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FXNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBFG's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.93 | $30.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.10 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 79K |
Analyst Outlook
SBFG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SBFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs FXNC's 2.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SBFG vs FXNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBFG or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBFG or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus First National Corporation at 15. 4x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SB Financial Group, Inc. wins at 2. 94x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +71.
0%, compared to +44. 8% for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus SBFG's +167. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBFG or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning SBFG is approximately 24% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 53% for SB Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBFG or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 11. 9% for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 27. 3% for SB Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBFG or FXNC?
First National Corporation (FXNC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 15. 4% for SB Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus 19. 0% for SBFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBFG or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 94x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for First National Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or FXNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 0% for First National Corporation (FXNC).
09Is SBFG or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, SBFG: +167. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBFG and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.