Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FXNC vs NKSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FXNC vs NKSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $246M | $232M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 22.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $8M |
FXNC vs NKSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 119.2 | +19.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FXNC vs NKSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FXNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 237.2% 10Y total return vs NKSH's 49.8%
NKSH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.76, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1203.84x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +45.3% vs FXNC's +43.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs NKSH's 7.9% | |
| Value | PEG 7.74 vs 141.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs NKSH's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs NKSH's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.3% vs FXNC's +43.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
FXNC vs NKSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FXNC vs NKSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC and NKSH operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $85M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.6% (NKSH) to 15.8% (FXNC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.0% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +91.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, FXNC trades at a 5% valuation discount to NKSH's 14.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FXNC offers better value at 9.31x vs NKSH's 141.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $246M | $232M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128M | $226M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.91x | 14.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.55x | 11.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.31x | 141.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.84x | 11.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.73x | 15.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NKSH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for NKSH. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FXNC's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs FXNC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 0.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $16,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,696 for NKSH. Over the past 12 months, NKSH leads with a +45.3% total return vs FXNC's +43.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 27.2% vs NKSH's 14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.1% | +45.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +49.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.9% | +27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +237.2% | +49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FXNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKSH's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.85 | $40.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.31 | $24.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 48K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and NKSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FXNC as "Buy" and NKSH as "Buy". For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.14% vs FXNC's 2.25%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKSH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FXNC vs NKSH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FXNC or NKSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). First National Corporation (FXNC) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FXNC or NKSH?
On trailing P/E, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the cheapest at 13.
9x versus National Bankshares, Inc. at 14. 6x. On forward P/E, National Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First National Corporation wins at 7. 74x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 141. 62x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FXNC or NKSH?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +64.
9%, compared to +27. 0% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +239. 8% versus NKSH's +50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FXNC or NKSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NKSH is approximately 8% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for First National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FXNC or NKSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to 96. 0% for First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FXNC or NKSH?
National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKSH leads at 22. 5% versus 19. 6% for FXNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FXNC or NKSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 7. 74x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 141. 62x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for First National Corporation — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FXNC or NKSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for First National Corporation (FXNC).
09Is FXNC or NKSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 2% yield, +239. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +239. 8%, NKSH: +50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FXNC and NKSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.