Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SBGI vs MEG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
SBGI vs MEG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $991M | $798M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.17B | $821M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 172.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.52B | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $866M | $11M |
SBGI vs MEG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Montrose Environmen… (MEG) | 100 | 96.8 | -3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBGI vs MEG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 2.42x
- Beta 0.75, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.42x
MEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.1%
- -1.4% 10Y total return vs SBGI's -28.9%
- 19.3% revenue growth vs SBGI's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.3% revenue growth vs SBGI's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 172.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.7% margin vs SBGI's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs MEG's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, vs MEG's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs SBGI's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs SBGI's -2.0%, ROIC 1.3% vs 2.8% |
SBGI vs MEG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBGI vs MEG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 3.9x MEG's $821M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.7% (MEG) to -3.5% (SBGI). On growth, MEG holds the edge at -5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $821M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $475M | $67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $115M | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | -5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.8% | +45.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SBGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SBGI's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEG's 18.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $798M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.81x | -157.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.28x | 172.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.74x | 18.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.65x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.62x | 8.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SBGI. MEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBGI's 12.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEG scores 4/9 vs SBGI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.3% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.21x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $348M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $866M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.76x | 4.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBGI five years ago would be worth $5,686 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,853 for MEG. Over the past 12 months, MEG leads with a +46.6% total return vs SBGI's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBGI at 1.7% vs MEG's -10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | -11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.3% | +46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | -27.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | -1.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | -10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SBGI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBGI is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEG's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBGI currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs MEG's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.88 | $32.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.89 | $14.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 491K | 332K |
Analyst Outlook
SBGI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SBGI as "Buy" and MEG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 123.5% upside for MEG (target: $49) vs 19.9% for SBGI (target: $17). For income investors, SBGI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.04% vs MEG's 0.54%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $49.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.3% |
SBGI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MEG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
SBGI vs MEG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBGI or MEG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI). Analysts rate Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SBGI or MEG?
Over the past 5 years, Sinclair, Inc.
(SBGI) delivered a total return of -43. 1%, compared to -61. 5% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEG returned -1. 4% versus SBGI's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SBGI or MEG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sinclair, Inc.
(SBGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MEG is approximately 143% more volatile than SBGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 12% for Sinclair, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SBGI or MEG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus -10. 7% for Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. grew EPS 93. 7% year-over-year, compared to -134. 3% for Sinclair, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEG leads at 15. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SBGI or MEG?
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 1% net margin versus -3. 5% for Sinclair, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBGI leads at 4. 9% versus 1. 5% for MEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBGI leads at 36. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SBGI or MEG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sinclair, Inc.
(SBGI) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 172. 3x for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — 160. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEG: 123. 5% to $49. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — SBGI or MEG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG).
08Is SBGI or MEG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sinclair, Inc.
(SBGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 7. 0% yield). Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBGI: -28. 9%, MEG: -1. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SBGI and MEG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SBGI (Communication Services) and MEG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SBGI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MEG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 26%
- Dividend Yield > 2.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.