SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+426.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SBLK vs GNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
SBLK vs GNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SBLK | GNK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $3.09B | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $114.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $9.32B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 0.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.07B | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $500M | $56M |
SBLK vs GNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SBLK
GNK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBLK vs GNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GNK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Income Pick
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth -17.6%, EPS growth -73.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.1%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs GNK's 401.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Defensive Pick
GNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.00, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.34x
- 8.1% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
- 3.0% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBLK | -17.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% |
| Value | SBLK | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | GNK | 8.1% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SBLK | Beta 0.73 vs GNK's 1.00 |
| Dividends | GNK | 3.0% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GNK | +94.4% vs SBLK's +83.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GNK | 3.0% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 0.7% vs 3.2% |
SBLK vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SBLK vs GNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGNKLAGGINGSBLK
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Co…
2leads
GNKGenco Shipping & Trad…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GNK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SBLK3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GNK5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GNK4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SBLK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GNK1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 110.0x SBLK's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.1% (GNK) to 8.1% (SBLK). On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $114.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $311M | $112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $9.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | $15.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | +1604.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.3% | +175.0% |
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SBLK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SBLK's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.73x | -252.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.00x | 14.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.87x | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 3.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.73x | — |
SBLK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNK delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBLK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $572M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $500M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.08x | 0.00x |
GNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $19,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, GNK leads with a +94.4% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNK at 26.6% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.3% | +39.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.1% | +94.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.6% | +103.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +977.3% | +401.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.1% | +26.6% |
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.20 | $26.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.79 | $12.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.8 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 415K |
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SBLK as "Buy" and GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -18.7% for GNK (target: $21). For income investors, GNK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% |
GNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GNK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBLK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallGenco Shipping & Trading Li… (GNK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SBLK vs GNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBLK or GNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger pick with -17. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) offers the better valuation at 36. 7x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBLK or GNK?
On forward P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBLK or GNK?
Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus GNK's +401. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBLK or GNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Genco Shipping & Trading Limited's 1. 00β — meaning GNK is approximately 36% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 44% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBLK or GNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is pulling ahead at -17. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. grew EPS -73. 9% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBLK leads at -10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBLK or GNK?
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBLK leads at 13. 5% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBLK leads at 22. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBLK or GNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBLK or GNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is SBLK or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, GNK: +401. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBLK and GNK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SBLK: -2.7% · GNK: 160459.3%)Net Margin>
%
(SBLK: 8.1% · GNK: 8.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.