REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SCCD vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
SCCD vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.18B | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-13M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 619.3x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $20M |
SCCD vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCD) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 32.1 | -67.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCD vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 100.0%, EPS growth 104.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs SCCD's 33.0%
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 619.3x)
- 17.1% yield, vs SCCD's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% FFO/revenue growth vs TPVG's 36.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 619.3x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs TPVG's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs SCCD's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs TPVG's +19.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5% |
SCCD vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG and SCCD operate at a comparable scale, with $97M and -$13M in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$13M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $551,999 | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.3% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 99% valuation discount to SCCD's 619.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 619.25x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.64x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 472.46x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCD delivers a 1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCD five years ago would be worth $13,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SCCD leads with a +29.0% total return vs TPVG's +19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCD at 14.3% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.4% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.80 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.97 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs SCCD's 0.82%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SCCD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SCCD vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCD or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCD or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 at 619. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCD or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) delivered a total return of +33. 0%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus SCCD's +34. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCD or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 77β — meaning TPVG is approximately 26% more volatile than SCCD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SCCD or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCD or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for SCCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SCCD or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD).
08Is SCCD or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCD: +34. 1%, TPVG: +91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SCCD and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCCD (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.