SCHL vs EDUC

For growth investors, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is the stronger pick with 2.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). Analysts rate Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) delivered a total return of +39.

9%, compared to -89. 3% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCHL returned +27. 1% versus EDUC's -59. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Scholastic Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning SCHL is approximately 16% more volatile than EDUC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 80% for Educational Development Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is pulling ahead at 2.

3% versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Scholastic Corporation grew EPS -117. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1071. 2% for Educational Development Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCHL leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is the more profitable company, earning -0.

1% net margin versus -15. 4% for Educational Development Corporation — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCHL leads at 1. 3% versus -19. 8% for EDUC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDUC leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, SCHL (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. EDUC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

77), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHL: +27. 1%, EDUC: -59. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SCHL pays a dividend while EDUC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.