Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SCKT
Socket Mobile, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-66.3%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$596M
5Y Perf.-80.2%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-57.5%

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SCKT logoSCKT
BLNK logoBLNK
CHPT logoCHPT
EVGO logoEVGO
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustryComputer HardwareEngineering & ConstructionSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailAsset Management
Market Cap$7M$91M$134M$596M$243M
Revenue (TTM)$15M$106M$411M$418M$97M
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-126M$-220M$-47M$-12M
Gross Margin49.7%26.0%30.5%20.2%83.5%
Operating Margin-21.3%-119.5%-51.1%-26.3%77.9%
Forward P/E6.5x
Total Debt$7M$11M$272M$107M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$42M$142M$151M$20M

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SCKT
BLNK
CHPT
EVGO
TPVG
StockNov 20May 26Return
Socket Mobile, Inc. (SCKT)10033.7-66.3%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)1002.9-97.1%
ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT)1000.9-99.1%
EVgo, Inc. (EVGO)10019.8-80.2%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10042.5-57.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 5 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. EVgo, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SCKT
Socket Mobile, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SCKT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick

BLNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

CHPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.61
Best for: income & stability
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
The Growth Play

EVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 2.19x
  • Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
  • 49.6% revenue growth vs SCKT's -19.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 93.3% 10Y total return vs SCKT's -76.5%
  • 50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
  • Beta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
  • 17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEVGO logoEVGO49.6% revenue growth vs SCKT's -19.6%
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Stability / SafetyTPVG logoTPVGBeta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TPVG logoTPVG+19.3% vs CHPT's -48.3%
Efficiency (ROA)TPVG logoTPVG-1.5% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 7.2% vs -109.7%

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SCKTSocket Mobile, Inc.
FY 2014
Cordless barcode scanning and related product and service
80.3%$13,665
Mobile handheld computer and related product and service
19.1%$3,256
OEM and legacy products
0.6%$100
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M
CHPTChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
56.3%$235M
License and Service
34.6%$144M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$38M
EVGOEVgo, Inc.
FY 2025
Charging Revenue Retail
50.0%$134M
Ancillary Revenue.
18.4%$49M
Charging Revenue Commercial
13.0%$35M
Charging Revenue OEM
9.8%$26M
Network Revenue OEM
5.0%$13M
Regulatory Credit Sales
3.8%$10M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 27.7x SCKT's $15M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$106M$411M$418M$97M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M-$115M-$180M-$39M-$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$126M-$220M-$47M-$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$47M-$67M-$165M$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.7%+26.0%+30.5%+20.2%+83.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.3%-119.5%-51.1%-26.3%+77.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-95.4%-118.7%-53.5%-11.1%+50.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.9%-44.5%-16.3%-39.5%-58.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.0%+11.7%+7.3%+45.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+99.9%+28.8%-66.7%-2.3%
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$7M$91M$134M$596M$243M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12M$60M$263M$552M$691M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.48x-0.40x-0.65x-6.13x4.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.47x0.73x0.32x1.55x2.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x0.67x6.77x0.66x0.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
EVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVGO scores 6/9 vs SCKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-106.8%-131.9%-3.5%-12.2%-3.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.7%-66.7%-25.8%-5.1%-1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-15.3%-109.7%-83.8%-21.9%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.6%-77.3%-41.6%-14.5%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.09x12.75x0.28x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5M-$31M$130M-$44M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$42M$142M$151M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$11M$272M$107M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.48x-9064.60x-8.58x-11.79x-1.02x
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs CHPT's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs CHPT's -67.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.1%+7.2%-12.5%-38.3%-6.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.5%+4.8%-48.3%-48.2%+19.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.4%-88.9%-96.6%-70.5%-3.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%-97.6%-98.6%-83.7%-13.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.5%-97.5%-96.8%-80.6%+93.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.8%-51.9%-67.6%-33.4%-1.2%
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SCKT and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SCKT is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.25x2.96x2.61x2.04x0.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.36$2.65$17.78$5.18$7.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.82$0.45$4.45$1.64$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.0%+29.9%+34.6%+36.7%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.566.455.040.158.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded95K2.1M474K4.4M504K
Evenly matched — SCKT and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CHPT as "Hold", EVGO as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 176.3% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 21.8% for CHPT (target: $8). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSCKT logoSCKTSocket Mobile, In…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.50$5.25$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts211612
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+17.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TPVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EVGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SCKT vs BLNK vs CHPT vs EVGO vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 6% for Socket Mobile, Inc. (SCKT). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -98. 6% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus BLNK's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Socket Mobile, Inc.

(SCKT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 25β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately -1305% more volatile than SCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -19. 6% for Socket Mobile, Inc. (SCKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -503. 3% for Socket Mobile, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 176.

3% to $5. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG?

In this comparison, TPVG (17.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SCKT, BLNK, CHPT, EVGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is SCKT or BLNK or CHPT or EVGO or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Socket Mobile, Inc.

(SCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 25)). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCKT: -76. 5%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SCKT and BLNK and CHPT and EVGO and TPVG?

These companies operate in different sectors (SCKT (Technology) and BLNK (Industrials) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while SCKT, BLNK, CHPT, EVGO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SCKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EVGO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SCKT and BLNK and CHPT and EVGO and TPVG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SCKT: -18.0% · BLNK: 11.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.