Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SCM vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
SCM vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $274M | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 61.6% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $593M | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $43M |
SCM vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellus Capital Inv… (SCM) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 171.6 | +71.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCM vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth -46.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.26x
CSWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs SCM's 135.4%
- NIM 7.0% vs SCM's 0.0%
- 10.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs CSWC's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs SCM's -13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% |
SCM vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 1.6x SCM's $104M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCM's 26.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $83.64T | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -235.8% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SCM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, SCM trades at a 38% valuation discount to CSWC's 16.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCM's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $274M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $847M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.18x | 16.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.37x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.33x | 27.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 8.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $0 for SCM. SCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSWC's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCM scores 3/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $573M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $593M | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,848 for SCM. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.0% total return vs SCM's -13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs SCM's -1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.0% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.7% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.4% | +234.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SCM and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCM is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs SCM's 62.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.39 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.43 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.8% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 207K | 664K |
Analyst Outlook
CSWC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SCM as "Hold" and CSWC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.0% upside for SCM (target: $13) vs -6.2% for CSWC (target: $23). CSWC is the only dividend payer here at 10.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.25 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SCM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SCM vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCM or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) is the stronger pick with 25.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCM or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Stellus Capital Investment Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCM or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to +28. 5% for Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +234. 2% versus SCM's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCM or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 19% more volatile than SCM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 108% for Capital Southwest Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCM or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) is pulling ahead at 25.
3% versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital Southwest Corporation grew EPS -28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Stellus Capital Investment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCM or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus 26. 1% for Stellus Capital Investment Corporation — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCM leads at 61. 6% versus 48. 5% for CSWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCM leads at 76. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCM or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (SCM) trades at 9.
4x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Capital Southwest Corporation — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCM: 37. 0% to $13. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCM or CSWC?
In this comparison, CSWC (10.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SCM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCM or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 10. 2% yield, +234. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSWC: +234. 2%, SCM: +135. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCM and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CSWC pays a dividend while SCM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.