Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Technology Distributors
Aerospace & Defense
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Technology Distributors | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $952M | $109.27B | $70.14B | $6.62B | $24.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.09B | $8.62B | $9.11B | $24.96B | $4.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $1.74B | $1.97B | $214M | $713M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 32.6% | 59.0% | 10.5% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 27.5% | 46.5% | 2.7% | 22.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 57.0x | 30.6x | 16.0x | 52.1x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $3.05B | $30.03B | $2.88B | $2.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $742M | $2.81B | $192M | $218M |
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 186.2 | +86.2% |
| Howmet Aerospace In… (HWM) | 100 | 2068.5 | +1968.5% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 286.0 | +186.0% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 301.4 | +201.4% |
| HEICO Corporation (HEI) | 100 | 290.3 | +190.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 52.1x)
HWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.4% 10Y total return vs HEI's 8.2%
- +73.8% vs TDG's -3.7%
- 15.0% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 21.1% vs 6.0%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
- PEG 0.98 vs HEI's 3.17
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
Among these 5 stocks, AVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HEI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 33.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 16.3% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 52.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SCSC's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AVT's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs TDG's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.0% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 21.1% vs 6.0% |
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDG leads 1 • SCSC leads 1 • AVT leads 0 • HEI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 8.1x SCSC's $3.1B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVT's 0.9%. On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $8.6B | $9.1B | $25.0B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $114M | $2.7B | $4.6B | $781M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $1.7B | $2.0B | $214M | $713M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $33M | $841M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +32.6% | +59.0% | +10.5% | +30.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +27.5% | +46.5% | +2.7% | +22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +20.2% | +21.6% | +0.9% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +16.6% | +20.6% | +0.1% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +19.1% | +13.9% | +33.9% | +14.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +71.4% | -13.1% | +12.9% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 80% valuation discount to HWM's 73.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.24x vs HEI's 3.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $952M | $109.3B | $70.1B | $6.6B | $24.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $973M | $111.6B | $97.4B | $9.3B | $26.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.47x | 73.46x | 38.72x | 29.40x | 59.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.65x | 57.00x | 30.56x | 16.01x | 52.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.45x | 1.24x | — | 3.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.43x | 46.24x | 21.48x | 12.44x | 21.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 13.24x | 7.94x | 0.30x | 5.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 20.67x | — | 1.41x | 9.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.15x | 76.36x | 38.63x | 11.47x | 28.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWM delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HWM scores 8/9 vs HEI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +33.1% | — | +4.3% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +15.0% | +8.6% | +1.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +21.1% | +20.9% | +6.0% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +23.2% | +20.8% | +7.9% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.57x | — | 0.57x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $2.3B | $27.2B | $2.7B | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $742M | $2.8B | $192M | $218M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $3.0B | $30.0B | $2.9B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.00x | 15.30x | 2.55x | 2.80x | 8.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWM five years ago would be worth $81,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,433 for SCSC. Over the past 12 months, HWM leads with a +73.8% total return vs TDG's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWM at 84.1% vs SCSC's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +28.8% | -8.6% | +64.6% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | +73.8% | -3.7% | +65.6% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.5% | +524.2% | +86.7% | +105.0% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.3% | +715.2% | +140.2% | +94.1% | +105.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +1240.1% | +595.3% | +132.4% | +823.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.0% | +84.1% | +23.1% | +27.0% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDG and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVT currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs TDG's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.94x | 0.79x | 1.28x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.25 | $287.56 | $1623.83 | $84.72 | $361.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.76 | $154.31 | $1123.61 | $44.25 | $256.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +94.8% | +76.5% | +95.4% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 60.0 | 56.5 | 76.9 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 2.1M | 370K | 1.0M | 698K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TDG and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SCSC as "Hold", HWM as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", AVT as "Hold", HEI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for HEI (target: $371) vs -1.9% for AVT (target: $79). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs HWM's 0.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $293.45 | $1568.30 | $79.33 | $371.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 23 | 39 | 20 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +13.3% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 2 | 12 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | $165.45 | $1.30 | $0.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.2% | +0.7% | +0.7% | +4.6% | +0.1% |
HWM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TDG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SCSC vs HWM vs TDG vs AVT vs HEI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HEICO Corporation (HEI) is the stronger pick with 16.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Howmet Aerospace Inc. at 73. 5x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 0. 98x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
Over the past 5 years, Howmet Aerospace Inc.
(HWM) delivered a total return of +715. 2%, compared to +34. 3% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWM returned +1231% versus SCSC's +16. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning SCSC is approximately 83% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HEICO Corporation (HEI) is pulling ahead at 16.
3% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HEICO Corporation grew EPS 33. 5% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEI leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus 2. 8% for SCSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 57. 0x for Howmet Aerospace Inc. — 45. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HEI: 28. 1% to $371. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), AVT (1. 6% yield), HWM (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SCSC, HEI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCSC or HWM or TDG or AVT or HEI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +583. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +583. 3%, SCSC: +16. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCSC and HWM and TDG and AVT and HEI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCSC (Technology) and HWM (Industrials) and TDG (Industrials) and AVT (Technology) and HEI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HWM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HEI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TDG, AVT pay a dividend while SCSC, HWM, HEI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.