Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SCVL vs CROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
SCVL vs CROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $487M | $5.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $4.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $368M | $1.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $130M |
SCVL vs CROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) | 100 | 136.9 | +36.9% |
| Crocs, Inc. (CROX) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCVL vs CROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.11x
CROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs SCVL's 62.2%
- Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 9.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs CROX's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs CROX's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs SCVL's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.3% vs CROX's +3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs CROX's -2.4%, ROIC 7.8% vs 21.7% |
SCVL vs CROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SCVL vs CROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 3.5x SCVL's $1.1B. SCVL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CROX's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | $946M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $671M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.3% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SCVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SCVL's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CROX's 6.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $487M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $747M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.64x | -69.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.37x | 7.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.11x | 6.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 4.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.01x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CROX. SCVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +23.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $259M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $130M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $368M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 329.89x | 10.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CROX five years ago would be worth $9,556 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,147 for SCVL. Over the past 12 months, SCVL leads with a +3.3% total return vs CROX's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CROX at -3.8% vs SCVL's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.5% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.3% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.8% | -10.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.5% | -4.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.2% | +1246.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | -3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CROX is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCVL's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs SCVL's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.57 | $122.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.04 | $73.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 395K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SCVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SCVL as "Hold" and CROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.6% upside for SCVL (target: $22) vs 2.7% for CROX (target: $107). SCVL is the only dividend payer here at 3.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $106.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.3% |
CROX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SCVL leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
SCVL vs CROX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCVL or CROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crocs, Inc. (CROX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCVL or CROX?
On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCVL or CROX?
Over the past 5 years, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) delivered a total return of -4. 4%, compared to -38. 5% for Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1246% versus SCVL's +62. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCVL or CROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Shoe Carnival, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning SCVL is approximately 23% more volatile than CROX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCVL or CROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoe Carnival, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CROX leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCVL or CROX?
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 1% net margin versus -2. 0% for Crocs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CROX leads at 22. 0% versus 7. 6% for SCVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CROX leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCVL or CROX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Shoe Carnival, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCVL: 23. 6% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCVL or CROX?
In this comparison, SCVL (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CROX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCVL or CROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +1246% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1246%, SCVL: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCVL and CROX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCVL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SCVL pays a dividend while CROX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.