Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Drilling
Software - Application
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.98B | $1.54B | $3.68B | $680M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.43B | $3.18B | $4.00B | $493M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $263M | $-376M | $174M |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 25.0% | 11.3% | 84.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 13.8% | -1.8% | 0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 62.3x | 5.6x | — | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $613M | $2.57B | $2.32B | $413M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $339M | $941M | $224M | $237M |
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seadrill Limited (SDRL) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
| Nabors Industries L… (NBR) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| Helmerich & Payne, … (HP) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SDRL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 80.1% 10Y total return vs HP's -3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.4%, current ratio 2.03x
NBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- +273.7% vs PD's -51.6%
HP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 35.9%, EPS growth -148.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.1%
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.80x
- 35.9% revenue growth vs SDRL's 3.8%
PD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 35.3% margin vs HP's -9.4%
- 18.1% ROA vs HP's -5.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.9% revenue growth vs SDRL's 3.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.3% margin vs HP's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs NBR's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, vs NBR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +273.7% vs PD's -51.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs HP's -5.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs 3.7% |
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PD leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBR leads 1 • SDRL leads 0 • HP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 8.1x PD's $493M. PD is the more profitable business, keeping 35.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HP's -9.4%. On growth, SDRL holds the edge at +25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $3.2B | $4.0B | $493M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $307M | $1.1B | $657M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $263M | -$376M | $174M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | -$23M | $256M | $111M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +25.0% | +11.3% | +84.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +13.8% | -1.8% | +0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +8.3% | -9.4% | +35.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | -0.7% | +6.4% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.3% | +9.3% | -8.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.0% | +102.5% | -47.8% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.0x trailing earnings, PD trades at a 30% valuation discount to NBR's 5.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBR's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PD's 146.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $1.5B | $3.7B | $680M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $3.2B | $5.8B | $856M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.48x | 5.62x | -22.23x | 3.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.35x | — | — | 6.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.55x | 3.47x | 6.74x | 146.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 0.48x | 0.98x | 1.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 0.97x | 1.29x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 31.61x | 6.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PD delivers a 71.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $-14 for HP. SDRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBR's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBR scores 7/9 vs HP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +17.8% | -13.6% | +71.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +5.3% | -5.7% | +18.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +6.2% | +3.7% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +6.8% | +4.1% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.78x | 0.82x | 1.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $274M | $1.6B | $2.1B | $176M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $339M | $941M | $224M | $237M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $613M | $2.6B | $2.3B | $413M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.05x | 3.07x | -1.92x | 3.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SDRL and NBR and HP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SDRL five years ago would be worth $18,008 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,974 for PD. Over the past 12 months, NBR leads with a +273.7% total return vs PD's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HP at 8.9% vs PD's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.5% | +74.2% | +24.1% | -40.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.6% | +273.7% | +99.5% | -51.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +0.6% | +29.1% | -74.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.1% | -2.5% | +44.0% | -80.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.1% | -67.0% | -3.5% | -80.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +0.2% | +8.9% | -36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SDRL and HP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HP is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBR's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SDRL currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs PD's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.53x | 0.87x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.23 | $105.80 | $41.68 | $18.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.30 | $23.27 | $14.65 | $5.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +91.2% | +88.5% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 62.3 | 60.7 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 681K | 348K | 1.2M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SDRL and NBR and HP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SDRL as "Hold", NBR as "Hold", HP as "Hold", PD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.7% upside for PD (target: $15) vs -16.1% for NBR (target: $81). For income investors, HP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs NBR's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $81.00 | $36.86 | $14.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 44 | 43 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.42 | $1.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +19.8% |
PD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SDRL vs NBR vs HP vs PD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDRL or NBR or HP or PD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Seadrill Limited (SDRL). PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seadrill Limited (SDRL) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
On trailing P/E, PagerDuty, Inc.
(PD) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Nabors Industries Ltd. at 5. 6x. On forward P/E, PagerDuty, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
Over the past 5 years, Seadrill Limited (SDRL) delivered a total return of +80.
1%, compared to -80. 3% for PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SDRL returned +80. 1% versus PD's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Nabors Industries Ltd. 's 1. 53β — meaning NBR is approximately 75% more volatile than HP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seadrill Limited (SDRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 178% for Nabors Industries Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus 3. 8% for Seadrill Limited (SDRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PagerDuty, Inc. grew EPS 416. 9% year-over-year, compared to -148. 4% for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HP leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
PagerDuty, Inc.
(PD) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 3% net margin versus -5. 4% for Seadrill Limited — meaning it keeps 35. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBR leads at 8. 3% versus 1. 2% for PD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PD leads at 84. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SDRL or NBR or HP or PD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PagerDuty, Inc.
(PD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 62. 3x for Seadrill Limited — 55. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PD: 99. 7% to $14. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — SDRL or NBR or HP or PD?
In this comparison, HP (2.
8% yield), NBR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SDRL, PD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SDRL or NBR or HP or PD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 8% yield). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HP: -3. 5%, NBR: -67. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SDRL and NBR and HP and PD?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDRL (Energy) and NBR (Energy) and HP (Energy) and PD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SDRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HP is a small-cap high-growth stock; PD is a small-cap deep-value stock. HP pays a dividend while SDRL, NBR, PD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.