Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SDST vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
SDST vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $23M | $23.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-233M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $913K | $1.62B |
SDST vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stardust Power Inc. (SDST) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 207.7 | +107.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDST vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, SDST is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 217.0% 10Y total return vs SDST's -98.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.4% revenue growth vs SDST's -18.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.2% margin vs SDST's -84.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs SDST's 3.17 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +256.7% vs SDST's -52.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs SDST's -206.1% |
SDST vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SDST vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB and SDST operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $23.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.43x | -34.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs SDST's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $912,574 | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALB five years ago would be worth $12,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $205 for SDST. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs SDST's -52.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALB at 3.0% vs SDST's -72.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.2% | +38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.2% | +256.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +217.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.6% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALB is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SDST's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs SDST's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.17x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.43 | $221.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.42 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 160K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
ALB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency.
SDST vs ALB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDST or ALB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Albemarle Corporation (ALB) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SDST or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) delivered a total return of +26.
8%, compared to -98. 0% for Stardust Power Inc. (SDST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALB returned +217. 0% versus SDST's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SDST or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
60β versus Stardust Power Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning SDST is approximately 98% more volatile than ALB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SDST or ALB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48.
7% year-over-year, compared to -450. 0% for Stardust Power Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SDST or ALB?
Stardust Power Inc.
(SDST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus 0. 0% for SDST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALB leads at 13. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SDST or ALB?
In this comparison, ALB (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SDST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SDST or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Stardust Power Inc. (SDST) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, SDST: -98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SDST and ALB?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDST (Industrials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ALB pays a dividend while SDST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.