SDST
Stardust Power Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-98.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SDST vs SQM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$13.08B
5Y Perf.+124.8%
SDST vs SQM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SDST | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $23M | $13.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $524M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $913K | $1.38B |
SDST vs SQM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SDST
SQM
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stardust Power Inc. (SDST) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Sociedad Química y … (SQM) | 100 | 224.8 | +124.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDST vs SQM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SQM leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SDST
Stardust Power Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, SDST is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: industrials exposure
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
The Income Pick
SQM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth -39.4%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 464.6% 10Y total return vs SDST's -98.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SQM | -39.4% revenue growth vs SDST's -18.0% |
| Quality / Margins | SQM | 12.1% margin vs SDST's -84.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SQM | Beta 1.24 vs SDST's 3.17 |
| Dividends | SQM | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SQM | +173.2% vs SDST's -52.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SQM | 4.5% ROA vs SDST's -206.1% |
SDST vs SQM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
SDST vs SQM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSQMLAGGINGSDST
SDSTStardust Power Inc.
1leads
SQMSociedad Química y Mi…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SDSTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SDST1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SQM1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SQM3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SQM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SQM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SDST leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM and SDST operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $917M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $524M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.9% | +34.8% |
SDST leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
SQM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $16.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.43x | -64.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.19x |
SQM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
SQM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SQM scores 4/9 vs SDST's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $912,574 | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 5.37x |
SQM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SQM five years ago would be worth $19,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $205 for SDST. Over the past 12 months, SQM leads with a +173.2% total return vs SDST's -52.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQM at 12.0% vs SDST's -72.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.2% | +31.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.2% | +173.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +40.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +464.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.6% | +12.0% |
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SQM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SQM is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SDST's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SQM currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs SDST's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.17x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.43 | $98.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.42 | $29.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +93.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 160K | 1.3M |
SQM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SQM is the only dividend payer here at 0.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SDSTStardust Power In… | SQMSociedad Química … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SQM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SDST leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
Best OverallSociedad Química y Minera d… (SQM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SDST vs SQM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDST or SQM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SDST or SQM?
Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +94. 2%, compared to -98. 0% for Stardust Power Inc. (SDST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +464. 6% versus SDST's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SDST or SQM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Stardust Power Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning SDST is approximately 157% more volatile than SQM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SDST or SQM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. grew EPS -120. 1% year-over-year, compared to -450. 0% for Stardust Power Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SDST or SQM?
Stardust Power Inc.
(SDST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -8. 9% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 0. 0% for SDST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SDST or SQM?
In this comparison, SQM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SDST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SDST or SQM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +464. 6% 10Y return). Stardust Power Inc. (SDST) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SQM: +464. 6%, SDST: -98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SDST and SQM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDST (Industrials) and SQM (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.