Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SDSTW
Stardust Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-23.9%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+107.8%
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$803M
5Y Perf.+214.4%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CL
Market Cap$13.05B
5Y Perf.+124.3%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.00B
5Y Perf.+113.1%

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SDSTW logoSDSTW
LAC logoLAC
SLI logoSLI
SQM logoSQM
ALB logoALB
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$6M$1.35B$803M$13.05B$24.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$0.00$4.33B$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-22M$-241M$-48M$524M$-233M
Gross Margin27.7%18.5%
Operating Margin21.1%5.6%
Forward P/E15.6x19.4x
Total Debt$10M$23M$477K$4.82B$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$913K$594M$32M$1.38B$1.62B

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SDSTW
LAC
SLI
SQM
ALB
StockJun 24May 26Return
Stardust Power Inc. (SDSTW)10076.1-23.9%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100207.8+107.8%
Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI)100314.4+214.4%
Sociedad Química y … (SQM)100224.3+124.3%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100213.1+113.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SQM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Albemarle Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SDSTW
Stardust Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

SDSTW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SLI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder

SQM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 468.7% 10Y total return vs ALB's 224.7%
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.51x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 12.1% margin vs SDSTW's -84.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Income Pick

ALB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 0.8%
  • Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
  • -4.4% revenue growth vs SDSTW's -12.7%
  • 0.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SQM's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALB logoALB-4.4% revenue growth vs SDSTW's -12.7%
ValueSQM logoSQMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSQM logoSQM12.1% margin vs SDSTW's -84.4%
Stability / SafetySQM logoSQMBeta 1.26 vs SLI's 1.62
DividendsALB logoALB0.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SQM's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+257.1% vs LAC's +77.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SQM logoSQM4.5% ROA vs SDSTW's -214.6%, ROIC 9.0% vs -148.1%

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SDSTWStardust Power Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SLIStandard Lithium Ltd.
FY 2016
SLPE
35.4%$71M
High Power Group
34.8%$70M
SLMTI
29.8%$60M
SQMSociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
FY 2024
Lithium and Derivatives
49.5%$2.2B
Iodine And Derivatives
21.4%$968M
Specialty plant nutrition
20.8%$942M
Potassium
6.0%$271M
Industrial Chemicals
1.7%$78M
Others
0.6%$28M
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSQMLAGGINGSLI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. SQM is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALB's -4.2%. On growth, ALB holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$0$4.3B$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$32M$28M$917M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$22M-$241M-$48M$524M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M-$648M-$18M$66M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.7%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.1%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.5%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.9%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-51.4%-21.4%+34.8%
SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SQM's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALB's 34.0x.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$6M$1.4B$803M$13.1B$24.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15M$780M$771M$16.5B$25.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.25x-26.52x-13.10x-64.36x-35.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.60x19.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.40x34.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.88x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x3.20x5.01x2.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.09x34.66x
SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SQM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SQM delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SDSTW. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQM's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.4%-26.9%-17.8%+9.5%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.1%-16.6%-15.9%+4.5%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-148.1%-7.1%-11.2%+9.0%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-180.7%-3.9%-10.7%+11.4%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922346
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.00x0.93x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M-$571M-$31M$3.4B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$912,574$594M$32M$1.4B$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$23M$476,715$4.8B$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.70x-1559.24x5.37x1.59x
SQM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SQM five years ago would be worth $19,446 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,114 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +257.1% total return vs LAC's +77.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQM at 12.4% vs LAC's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.0%+16.8%-17.8%+32.5%+41.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+144.5%+77.4%+172.9%+170.0%+257.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.5%-56.3%+17.7%+41.9%+12.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.5%-28.9%+21.3%+94.5%+32.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.5%+229.6%+222.1%+468.7%+224.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.0%-24.1%+5.6%+12.4%+3.9%
SQM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SQM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SQM is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLI's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SQM currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs SDSTW's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x1.51x1.62x1.26x1.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.30$10.52$6.40$98.00$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.02$2.47$1.41$29.36$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.6%+52.9%+61.4%+93.3%+92.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.961.753.357.556.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K9.1M1.8M1.3M2.0M
SQM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LAC as "Hold", SLI as "Buy", SQM as "Hold", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.7% upside for LAC (target: $7) vs -14.7% for SQM (target: $78). For income investors, ALB offers the higher dividend yield at 0.80% vs SQM's 0.26%.

MetricSDSTW logoSDSTWStardust Power In…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …SQM logoSQMSociedad Química …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$4.75$78.00$196.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts1531645
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SQM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ALB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallSociedad Química y Minera d… (SQM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SDSTW vs LAC vs SLI vs SQM vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger pick with -4.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 4% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM). Analysts rate Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -28. 9% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +468. 7% versus SDSTW's -19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Standard Lithium Ltd. 's 1. 62β — meaning SLI is approximately 28% more volatile than SQM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 93% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is pulling ahead at -4.

4% versus -39. 4% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -46. 1% for Stardust Power Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SQM leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB?

Stardust Power Inc.

(SDSTW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 0. 0% for SLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Albemarle Corporation — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAC: 25. 7% to $7. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

8% yield), SQM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SDSTW, LAC, SLI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is SDSTW or LAC or SLI or SQM or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +224. 7%, SDSTW: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SDSTW and LAC and SLI and SQM and ALB?

These companies operate in different sectors (SDSTW (Industrials) and LAC (Basic Materials) and SLI (Basic Materials) and SQM (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

ALB pays a dividend while SDSTW, LAC, SLI, SQM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SDSTW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SQM

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.