Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Agricultural Farm Products
Communication Equipment
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Specialty Business Services | Agricultural Farm Products | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $529.86B | $24.18B | $19.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $72M | $55.71B | $71M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $583M | $-25.02B | $453M | $-342M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 40.8% | 6.6% | 53.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | -121.4% | 2.3% | -405.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 10.0x | 17.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $8.76B | $8.83B | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $178M | $24.81B | $1.23B | $2.34B |
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaboard Corporation (SEB) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.32, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.40x
- Better valuation composite
- 5.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 2.9%
- 2.9% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs SEB's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SEB's 55.6%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs TSN's +26.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs SEB's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs TSN's +26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 2.6% vs -0.1% |
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEB leads in 1 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • TSN leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SEB and TSN and ASTS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 785.6x ASTS's $71M. SEB is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $72M | $55.7B | $71M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | -$74M | $2.7B | -$237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $583M | -$25.0B | $453M | -$342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$16.2B | $1.2B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +40.8% | +6.6% | +53.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -121.4% | +2.3% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -349.6% | +0.8% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -227.0% | +2.2% | -16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -26.9% | +4.4% | +27.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +59.5% | +36.1% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SEB and TSN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, SEB trades at a 82% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEB's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSN's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $529.9B | $24.2B | $19.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $513.8B | $31.8B | $16.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.77x | 10.01x | 49.95x | -48.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 17.46x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.54x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | — | 11.34x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 7405.21x | 0.44x | 269.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 4.56x | 1.30x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 722.69x | — | 20.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEB delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TSN's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEB scores 7/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | -88.4% | +2.5% | -21.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | -47.3% | +1.3% | -12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -0.1% | +4.1% | -47.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | -0.1% | +4.6% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.08x | 0.48x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | -$16.1B | $7.6B | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $178M | $24.8B | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $8.8B | $8.8B | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.02x | 9.20x | 2.73x | -21.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs TSN's +26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs SEB's 6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +106.4% | +17.9% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.4% | +73.1% | +26.8% | +158.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +198.1% | +45.6% | +1194.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.4% | -79.6% | -1.6% | +688.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.6% | -78.8% | +23.1% | +568.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +43.9% | +13.3% | +134.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEB and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEB is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 2.93x | 0.33x | 2.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5989.37 | $23.59 | $69.48 | $129.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2437.00 | $6.60 | $50.56 | $22.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +68.3% | +97.8% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.2 | 55.5 | 64.5 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 1.6M | 2.7M | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
TSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", TSN as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 3.4% for TSN (target: $70). For income investors, TSN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.95% vs SEB's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $70.25 | $103.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 30 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $9.34 | — | $2.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
SEB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SEB vs SPIR vs TSN vs ASTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Seaboard Corporation (SEB) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
On trailing P/E, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the cheapest at 8.
8x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 812% more volatile than SEB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 48% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaboard Corporation grew EPS 469. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSN leads at 2. 6% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.
6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS?
In this comparison, TSN (2.
9% yield), SEB (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEB or SPIR or TSN or ASTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 9% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSN: +23. 1%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEB and SPIR and TSN and ASTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEB (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and TSN (Consumer Defensive) and ASTS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TSN pays a dividend while SEB, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.