REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SELF vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
SELF vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $61M | $83.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 30.1x | 27.4x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1.47B |
SELF vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Self Storage… (SELF) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SELF vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SELF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 34.0%, current ratio 11.42x
- PEG 0.69 vs AMT's 3.76
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 113.8% 10Y total return vs SELF's 69.9%
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SELF's 1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SELF's 1.4% | |
| Value | PEG 0.69 vs 3.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs SELF's 16.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (34.0% vs 434.2%) | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs AMT's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs SELF's 3.1%, ROIC 6.9% vs 3.5% |
SELF vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SELF vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 851.6x SELF's $13M. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SELF's 16.0%. On growth, AMT holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SELF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.1x trailing earnings, SELF trades at a 10% valuation discount to AMT's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SELF offers better value at 0.69x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $83.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70M | $127.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.06x | 33.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.69x | 4.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.47x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.83x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 8.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.80x | 22.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $4 for SELF. SELF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs SELF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.39x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SELF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SELF five years ago would be worth $13,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,525 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, SELF leads with a +7.8% total return vs AMT's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SELF at 7.7% vs AMT's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | -14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.9% | +113.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SELF and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SELF's 0.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SELF currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.89 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +76.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SELF and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SELF offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs AMT's 3.75%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SELF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SELF vs AMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SELF or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF). Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SELF or AMT?
On trailing P/E, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the cheapest at 30. 1x versus American Tower Corporation at 33. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SELF or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) delivered a total return of +37. 6%, compared to -14. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMT returned +113. 8% versus SELF's +69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SELF or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Global Self Storage, Inc. 's 0. 20β — meaning SELF is approximately -627% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SELF or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus 1. 4% for Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -5. 3% for Global Self Storage, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMT leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SELF or AMT?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 16. 0% for Global Self Storage, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 20. 5% for SELF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SELF or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).
08Is SELF or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, SELF: +69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SELF and AMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.