Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SES vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
SES vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $317M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -352.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $86.81B |
SES vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SES AI Corporation (SES) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SES vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SES is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.3%, EPS growth 29.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.91, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 8.95x
- 9.3% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs SES's -90.9%
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.3% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SES's -331.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs SES's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs SES's +21.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SES's -26.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -35.1% |
SES vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SES vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 33888.9x SES's $22M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SES's -3.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SES leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $296M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.10x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-32 for SES. SES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs SES's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.3% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $981 for SES. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs SES's +21.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs SES's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.8% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.4% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.2% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.3% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SES's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs SES's 26.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.91x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.73 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.78 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.3% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.9 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SES as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 174.9% upside for SES (target: $3) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.70 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SES leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SES vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SES or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SES AI Corporation (SES) is the stronger pick with 929.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SES or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -90. 2% for SES AI Corporation (SES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus SES's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SES or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus SES AI Corporation's 2. 91β — meaning SES is approximately 93% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SES or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SES AI Corporation (SES) is pulling ahead at 929.
4% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 0% for SES AI Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SES or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -347. 8% for SES AI Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -393. 4% for SES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SES leads at 53. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SES or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SES: 174.
9% to $2. 70.
07Which pays a better dividend — SES or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SES or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, SES: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SES and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SES is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.