Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBC vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SFBC vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $107M | $196M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $119M |
SFBC vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Financial Ban… (SFBC) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 297.4 | +197.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBC vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -0.7%, EPS growth 54.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 0.15x
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.8%
- 133.3% 10Y total return vs SFBC's 105.9%
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs SFBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs CZWI's 0.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SFBC's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs SFBC's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs SFBC's 0.5% |
SFBC vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SFBC vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI and SFBC operate at a comparable scale, with $90M and $62M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (CZWI) to 11.6% (SFBC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 7% valuation discount to SFBC's 15.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $196M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | $129M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.01x | 13.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.13x | 14.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.33x | 18.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for SFBC. SFBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBC scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$117M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $15,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,352 for SFBC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +38.0% total return vs SFBC's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.3% vs SFBC's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.0% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +147.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +56.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.9% | +133.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | +35.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFBC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZWI's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs SFBC's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.69 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.67 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 27K |
Analyst Outlook
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CZWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.82% vs SFBC's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.2% |
CZWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SFBC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SFBC vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBC or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the stronger pick with -0. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBC or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBC or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +56. 8%, compared to +3. 5% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +133. 3% versus SFBC's +105. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBC or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning CZWI is approximately 88% more volatile than SFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBC or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is pulling ahead at -0. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 54. 4% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBC or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 11. 6% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFBC leads at 14. 1% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFBC leads at 63. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SFBC or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC).
08Is SFBC or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 1. 8% yield, +105. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFBC: +105. 9%, CZWI: +133. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SFBC and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.