Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $107M | $196M | $419M | $518M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $90M | $137M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $14M | $43M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 54.7% | 70.2% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 7.0% | 41.4% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 11.2x | 10.0x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $52M | $0.00 | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $119M | $245M | $167M |
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Financial Ban… (SFBC) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 297.4 | +197.4% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 407.6 | +307.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 100.7 | +0.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.27 vs KRNY's 0.82, lower leverage
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.8%
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs KRNY's 5.3%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 157.6% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 133.3%
- PEG 0.58 vs CZWI's 2.21
- NIM 4.5% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 11.2x), PEG 0.58 vs 2.21
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 130.2%
- 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +42.1% vs SFBC's -15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 11.2x), PEG 0.58 vs 2.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs KRNY's 0.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs KRNY's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.1% vs SFBC's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFBC's 0.5% |
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • SFBC leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $344M annually — 5.6x SFBC's $62M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $90M | $137M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $9M | $58M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $14M | $43M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $11M | $36M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +54.7% | +70.2% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +7.0% | +41.4% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +16.0% | +31.4% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +11.5% | +33.6% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +63.0% | -3.4% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 50% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.58x vs CZWI's 2.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $196M | $419M | $518M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | $129M | $174M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.01x | 13.97x | 9.84x | 19.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.21x | 9.96x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.75x | 0.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.13x | 14.54x | 3.00x | 44.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 2.18x | 3.05x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.05x | 1.69x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.33x | 18.92x | 9.08x | 24.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. SFBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBC scores 7/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +7.8% | +18.2% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% | +2.3% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +2.0% | +18.3% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +0.6% | +5.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.28x | — | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$117M | -$67M | -$245M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $119M | $245M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $52M | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.16x | 1.39x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $26,128 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,032 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +42.1% total return vs SFBC's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.3% vs SFBC's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +18.2% | +7.6% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.0% | +38.0% | +16.1% | +42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +147.6% | +102.0% | +35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +56.8% | +161.3% | -19.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.9% | +133.3% | +157.6% | -9.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | +35.3% | +26.4% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFBC and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRNY's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRNY currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SFBC's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.51x | 0.75x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.69 | $22.62 | $50.10 | $8.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.67 | $12.83 | $36.91 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +90.2% | +88.3% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 50.7 | 59.6 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 27K | 12K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy", KRNY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 15.3% for KRNY (target: $10). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.35% vs SFBC's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $57.00 | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.37 | $0.98 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.2% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SFBC vs CZWI vs BSVN vs KRNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +161. 3%, compared to -19. 7% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +157. 6% versus KRNY's -9. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Kearny Financial Corp. 's 0. 82β — meaning KRNY is approximately 200% more volatile than SFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSVN leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 2x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 28. 8% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC).
09Is SFBC or CZWI or BSVN or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 1. 8% yield, +105. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFBC: +105. 9%, KRNY: -9. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFBC and CZWI and BSVN and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.