SGA vs BBGI vs IHRT vs NXST

For growth investors, iHeartMedia, Inc.

(IHRT) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) offers the better valuation at 59. 5x trailing P/E (5. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) delivered a total return of +37. 2%, compared to -82. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +304. 7% versus BBGI's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saga Communications, Inc.

(SGA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 's 3. 46β — meaning BBGI is approximately 1728% more volatile than SGA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Saga Communications, Inc. (SGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), iHeartMedia, Inc.

(IHRT) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iHeartMedia, Inc. grew EPS 54. 3% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IHRT leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 2% net margin versus -95. 4% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXST leads at 17. 4% versus -2. 4% for BBGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 58. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NXST: 40.

1% to $250. 00.

In this comparison, SGA (11.

0% yield), NXST (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BBGI, IHRT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Saga Communications, Inc.

(SGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 11. 0% yield). Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) carries a higher beta of 3. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGA: -33. 7%, BBGI: -83. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SGA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BBGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXST is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SGA, NXST pay a dividend while BBGI, IHRT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.