Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SHC vs MMM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
SHC vs MMM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $4.51B | $76.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $25.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $118M | $2.79B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 39.5% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.27B | $12.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346M | $5.24B |
SHC vs MMM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sotera Health Compa… (SHC) | 100 | 58.4 | -41.6% |
| 3M Company (MMM) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHC vs MMM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 68.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs MMM's 1.5%
MMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 34.2% 10Y total return vs SHC's -37.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, current ratio 1.71x
- Beta 1.06, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs MMM's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.1% margin vs SHC's 9.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs SHC's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.0% vs MMM's +8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs SHC's 3.7%, ROIC 28.1% vs 11.8% |
SHC vs MMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHC vs MMM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 21.0x SHC's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.1% (MMM) to 9.9% (SHC). On growth, SHC holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $517M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $118M | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +39.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | -39.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SHC and MMM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, MMM trades at a 58% valuation discount to SHC's 58.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MMM's 15.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHC's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $76.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $84.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.52x | 24.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.39x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.21x | 15.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.87x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.47x | 16.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.20x | 54.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMM delivers a 65.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $65 in annual profit, vs $21 for SHC. MMM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHC's 3.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHC scores 6/9 vs MMM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.6% | +65.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +28.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.75x | 2.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.85x | 6.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMM five years ago would be worth $9,887 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,712 for SHC. Over the past 12 months, SHC leads with a +23.0% total return vs MMM's +8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMM at 22.5% vs SHC's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.0% | +8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +83.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.9% | -1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | +34.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.8% | +22.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMM is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHC's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMM currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs SHC's 79.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.85 | $177.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.80 | $137.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 40.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHC as "Buy" and MMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for SHC (target: $22) vs 13.8% for MMM (target: $167). MMM is the only dividend payer here at 1.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $166.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% |
MMM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SHC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SHC vs MMM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHC or MMM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sotera Health Company (SHC) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for 3M Company (MMM). 3M Company (MMM) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sotera Health Company (SHC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHC or MMM?
On trailing P/E, 3M Company (MMM) is the cheapest at 24.
4x versus Sotera Health Company at 58. 5x. On forward P/E, Sotera Health Company is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHC or MMM?
Over the past 5 years, 3M Company (MMM) delivered a total return of -1.
1%, compared to -32. 9% for Sotera Health Company (SHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMM returned +34. 2% versus SHC's -37. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHC or MMM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 3M Company (MMM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus Sotera Health Company's 1. 32β — meaning SHC is approximately 25% more volatile than MMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 3M Company (MMM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Sotera Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHC or MMM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sotera Health Company (SHC) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus 1. 5% for 3M Company (MMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sotera Health Company grew EPS 68. 8% year-over-year, compared to -20. 5% for 3M Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHC leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHC or MMM?
3M Company (MMM) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Sotera Health Company — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHC leads at 33. 8% versus 18. 3% for MMM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHC leads at 55. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHC or MMM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sotera Health Company (SHC) trades at 16.
4x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for 3M Company — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHC: 39. 2% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHC or MMM?
In this comparison, MMM (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHC or MMM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 3M Company (MMM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMM: +34. 2%, SHC: -37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHC and MMM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SHC (Healthcare) and MMM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MMM pays a dividend while SHC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.